Analysis of Deviation in AI-Generated Headlines Across News Genres: A Multidimensional Empirical Study

This paper systematically evaluates the reliability of Large Language Models (LLMs) in news headline generation. With the full integration of artificial intelligence technology into the field of news production, AI generated content has attracted continuous attention in terms of factual accuracy and emotional adaptability. The existing research lacks a systematic quality evaluation system for different types of news. To this end, this study constructed four kinds of news corpora of science and technology, finance, entertainment and society, generated titles based on qwen-max API, and made quantitative analysis through three-dimensional indicators of factuality, emotional tendency and keyword coverage. The empirical study shows that the fact bias of financial titles is the most significant, the emotional bias of entertainment titles is the most prominent, and the coverage of technology keywords is the weakest. This discovery reveals the effect differences of the generative model in different text fields, and provides an empirical basis for news agencies to establish a typed quality control mechanism. The follow-up research will expand the multimodal news generation evaluation, and explore the field adaptive generation optimization path.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20268403004/pdf
Primary Topic
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Deviation in AI-Generated Headlines Across News Genres: A Multidimensional Empirical Study

Longying Liao
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
article

Analysis of Deviation in AI-Generated Headlines Across News Genres: A Multidimensional Empirical Study

Longying Liao
article en

Abstract

This paper systematically evaluates the reliability of Large Language Models (LLMs) in news headline generation. With the full integration of artificial intelligence technology into the field of news production, AI generated content has attracted continuous attention in terms of factual accuracy and emotional adaptability. The existing research lacks a systematic quality evaluation system for different types of news. To this end, this study constructed four kinds of news corpora of science and technology, finance, entertainment and society, generated titles based on qwen-max API, and made quantitative analysis through three-dimensional indicators of factuality, emotional tendency and keyword coverage. The empirical study shows that the fact bias of financial titles is the most significant, the emotional bias of entertainment titles is the most prominent, and the coverage of technology keywords is the weakest. This discovery reveals the effect differences of the generative model in different text fields, and provides an empirical basis for news agencies to establish a typed quality control mechanism. The follow-up research will expand the multimodal news generation evaluation, and explore the field adaptive generation optimization path.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.