Dose Conversion Factors in Coronary Diagnostic and Therapeutic Interventions: The Good, the Bad, and the challenges of Dose Estimation

Interventional cardiology procedures, particularly coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), are among the most radiation-intensive medical imaging techniques. Accurate estimation of patient radiation dose is essential for risk assessment, dose optimization, and the development of diagnostic reference levels. This scoping review critically analyzes the current literature on dose conversion factors based on kerma-area product (KAP) for estimating effective (E) and organ-specific (HT) doses in adult patients undergoing CA and PCI. A total of 14 studies meeting defined eligibility criteria were included, encompassing methodologies such as Monte Carlo simulations (e.g., PCXMC, Geant4), physical phantoms, and clinical measurements. Reported E/KAP factors varied from 0.14 to 0.33 mSv/Gy·cm², with PCI generally yielding higher values. HT/KAP values were notably highest for lungs and varied based on sex, anatomy, and procedural parameters. Technical factors such as X-ray filtration also significantly influenced dose estimation. The findings highlight substantial methodological heterogeneity and emphasize the need to standardize conversion factor recommendations across settings. Future efforts should focus on integrating personalized dosimetry, artificial intelligence tools, and real-time dose monitoring to enhance radiological safety and ensure consistent practice in interventional cardiology.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2026005/pdf
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dose Conversion Factors in Coronary Diagnostic and Therapeutic Interventions: The Good, the Bad, and the challenges of Dose Estimation

D. Lopez, Adlin López, Sergio Ramos-Avasola, Jorge L. Delgado-Morales et al.
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

Dose Conversion Factors in Coronary Diagnostic and Therapeutic Interventions: The Good, the Bad, and the challenges of Dose Estimation

D. Lopez, Adlin López, Sergio Ramos-Avasola, Jorge L. Delgado-Morales, Jugleys A. Seijas-Acosta, Jaime J. Gordon
article en

Abstract

Interventional cardiology procedures, particularly coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), are among the most radiation-intensive medical imaging techniques. Accurate estimation of patient radiation dose is essential for risk assessment, dose optimization, and the development of diagnostic reference levels. This scoping review critically analyzes the current literature on dose conversion factors based on kerma-area product (KAP) for estimating effective (E) and organ-specific (HT) doses in adult patients undergoing CA and PCI. A total of 14 studies meeting defined eligibility criteria were included, encompassing methodologies such as Monte Carlo simulations (e.g., PCXMC, Geant4), physical phantoms, and clinical measurements. Reported E/KAP factors varied from 0.14 to 0.33 mSv/Gy·cm², with PCI generally yielding higher values. HT/KAP values were notably highest for lungs and varied based on sex, anatomy, and procedural parameters. Technical factors such as X-ray filtration also significantly influenced dose estimation. The findings highlight substantial methodological heterogeneity and emphasize the need to standardize conversion factor recommendations across settings. Future efforts should focus on integrating personalized dosimetry, artificial intelligence tools, and real-time dose monitoring to enhance radiological safety and ensure consistent practice in interventional cardiology.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.