Surgical Case Logging—Orthopaedic Application
» Surgical case logs remain vital yet imperfect, often emphasizing volume over competency, and allowing data entry and coding inconsistencies. » Lack of standardization across programs limits comparability and weakens the role of logs as true surgical competency measures. » Case volume alone may not reflect surgical skill or autonomy, even among trainees meeting ACGME minimums. » Emerging AI, EHR integration, and intraoperative analytics promise more accurate, efficient, and educationally valuable logging. » The future is competency-based, linking procedural data with autonomy, complexity, and outcomes to better gauge readiness for independent practice.
Authors
- J Japa
- Noorullah Maqsoodi
- Mark Ehioghae
- Kevin Yoon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9367-4214)
- Aaron Phung
- Jamie Lee
- Ala Alshomali
- Sean Bae
- Addisu Mesfin
- Justin Hyde
Institutions
- MedStar Washington Hospital Center (US)
- Boston Medical Center (US)
- Georgetown University (US)
- Washington Hospital (US)
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- JBJS Open Access
- Published
- 2026-04-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.oa.25.00284
- Primary Topic
- Surgical Simulation and Training
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00