Lateral intubation with the Macintosh laryngoscope and C-MAC D blade videolaryngoscope (LATIN): A randomized controlled trial

Background and aims: Lateral intubation is frequently encountered outside operating room settings, particularly for endoscopic procedures. Challenges faced by anesthesiologists include a lack of training and experience in performing intubation in the lateral position, and the paucity of data regarding the ideal method. This study was aimed at comparing the glottis visualization times and intubation times with Macintosh laryngoscopes and C-MAC D blade video laryngoscopes in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1 and 2 patients without any risk factors for difficult airway, in the right lateral decubitus position. Materials and methods: The primary outcome was glottis visualization time. Secondary outcomes included intubation time, bougie use, intubation difficulty score, use of external laryngeal pressure, number of operators required, and complications. All intubators were trained experienced operators trained in lateral intubation on mannequins. Clinical trial registration is available at https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/login.php, ID: CTRI/2024/06/068243. Results: This randomized controlled trial included 62 patients, 31 per group, undergoing elective procedures under general anesthesia and requiring endotracheal intubation. The patients were able to be intubated in the lateral position with a success rate of 96.8%. The mean glottis visualization time was 7.9 ± 3.1 s in the Macintosh (M) group (n = 32) and 6.8 ± 3.1 s in the C-MAC D blade (C) group (n = 29), and did not significantly differ between groups (p = 0.14). The intubation time was 7.5 ± 5 s (n = 31) in group M and 6 ± 3.5 s (n = 29) in group C, and did not significantly differ between groups (p = 0.61). No major complications were observed. Conclusion: Both Macintosh and C-MAC D blade laryngoscopes can be effectively used by trained clinicians for intubation in the lateral position. Registration details: Clinical trial registration is available at https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/login.php, ID: CTRI/2024/06/068243.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2026.03.010
Primary Topic
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lateral intubation with the Macintosh laryngoscope and C-MAC D blade videolaryngoscope (LATIN): A randomized controlled trial

PB Sryma, Renjith Viswanath, Ganga Reghupathy, Ganesan C
Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
article

Lateral intubation with the Macintosh laryngoscope and C-MAC D blade videolaryngoscope (LATIN): A randomized controlled trial

PB Sryma, Renjith Viswanath, Ganga Reghupathy, Ganesan C
article en

Abstract

Background and aims: Lateral intubation is frequently encountered outside operating room settings, particularly for endoscopic procedures. Challenges faced by anesthesiologists include a lack of training and experience in performing intubation in the lateral position, and the paucity of data regarding the ideal method. This study was aimed at comparing the glottis visualization times and intubation times with Macintosh laryngoscopes and C-MAC D blade video laryngoscopes in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1 and 2 patients without any risk factors for difficult airway, in the right lateral decubitus position. Materials and methods: The primary outcome was glottis visualization time. Secondary outcomes included intubation time, bougie use, intubation difficulty score, use of external laryngeal pressure, number of operators required, and complications. All intubators were trained experienced operators trained in lateral intubation on mannequins. Clinical trial registration is available at https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/login.php, ID: CTRI/2024/06/068243. Results: This randomized controlled trial included 62 patients, 31 per group, undergoing elective procedures under general anesthesia and requiring endotracheal intubation. The patients were able to be intubated in the lateral position with a success rate of 96.8%. The mean glottis visualization time was 7.9 ± 3.1 s in the Macintosh (M) group (n = 32) and 6.8 ± 3.1 s in the C-MAC D blade (C) group (n = 29), and did not significantly differ between groups (p = 0.14). The intubation time was 7.5 ± 5 s (n = 31) in group M and 6 ± 3.5 s (n = 29) in group C, and did not significantly differ between groups (p = 0.61). No major complications were observed. Conclusion: Both Macintosh and C-MAC D blade laryngoscopes can be effectively used by trained clinicians for intubation in the lateral position. Registration details: Clinical trial registration is available at https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/login.php, ID: CTRI/2024/06/068243.

Journal of Taibah University Medical SciencesVol. 21(2)
PSG Institute of Medical Sciences & Research (IN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur (IN), Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (IN), PSG Institute of Advanced Studies (IN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.