Personalized Approach for Acne Management With Dermocosmetics According to Initial Skin Sensitivity

BACKGROUND: Current acne management relies largely on topical and systemic pharmacotherapy, but these treatments frequently cause cutaneous adverse reactions. Such side effects are of particular concern in patients with initial skin sensitivity, highlighting the need for personalized approaches. METHODS: This 12-week prospective observational study included 308 Korean acne patients to compare the clinical efficacy of a specific dermo-cosmetic (DC) formulation used as monotherapy versus combination therapy in acne patients, and to evaluate a sensitivity-based approach to improve quality of life. Patients were classified into DC monotherapy (n = 151) or combination therapy (n = 157), and to sensitive (n = 144) or non-sensitive (n = 164) subgroups. Primary outcomes were Global Evaluation of Acne (GEA), total lesion count, and sebum secretion levels. Secondary outcomes included skin sensitization score, tolerance assessment, quality of life, and adverse events. RESULTS: The DC monotherapy group showed significantly greater improvement in GEA scores, fewer sensitivity symptoms, improved quality of life, and greater tolerability than the combination therapy group (all p < 0.0001). In the sensitive patient subgroup, DC monotherapy was also significantly superior to combination therapy in terms of GEA, tolerability, sensitivity symptoms, and quality of life (all p < 0.0001). In patients without initial sensitivity, improvement in GEA (p = 0.0079), total lesion count (p < 0.0001), and sebum secretion (p < 0.0001) was significantly greater in the combination therapy than in the DC monotherapy. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that baseline skin sensitivity may represent an important determinant of treatment selection and support a sensitivity-guided personalized treatment approach in acne management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.70831
Primary Topic
Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Personalized Approach for Acne Management With Dermocosmetics According to Initial Skin Sensitivity

Young Hoon Yoon, Hyun Jeong Ju, Je Ho Han, Heesang Kye et al.
Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology
Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
article

Personalized Approach for Acne Management With Dermocosmetics According to Initial Skin Sensitivity

Young Hoon Yoon, Hyun Jeong Ju, Je Ho Han, Heesang Kye, Young Jun Woo, Eunsun Baek, Tae In Kim, Jong Yeob Kim, Su Jin Jeong
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current acne management relies largely on topical and systemic pharmacotherapy, but these treatments frequently cause cutaneous adverse reactions. Such side effects are of particular concern in patients with initial skin sensitivity, highlighting the need for personalized approaches. METHODS: This 12-week prospective observational study included 308 Korean acne patients to compare the clinical efficacy of a specific dermo-cosmetic (DC) formulation used as monotherapy versus combination therapy in acne patients, and to evaluate a sensitivity-based approach to improve quality of life. Patients were classified into DC monotherapy (n = 151) or combination therapy (n = 157), and to sensitive (n = 144) or non-sensitive (n = 164) subgroups. Primary outcomes were Global Evaluation of Acne (GEA), total lesion count, and sebum secretion levels. Secondary outcomes included skin sensitization score, tolerance assessment, quality of life, and adverse events. RESULTS: The DC monotherapy group showed significantly greater improvement in GEA scores, fewer sensitivity symptoms, improved quality of life, and greater tolerability than the combination therapy group (all p < 0.0001). In the sensitive patient subgroup, DC monotherapy was also significantly superior to combination therapy in terms of GEA, tolerability, sensitivity symptoms, and quality of life (all p < 0.0001). In patients without initial sensitivity, improvement in GEA (p = 0.0079), total lesion count (p < 0.0001), and sebum secretion (p < 0.0001) was significantly greater in the combination therapy than in the DC monotherapy. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that baseline skin sensitivity may represent an important determinant of treatment selection and support a sensitivity-guided personalized treatment approach in acne management.

Journal of Cosmetic DermatologyVol. 25(4)
Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences (KR), Kyung Hee University Medical Center (KR), University Dermatology (US), Skin Research Center (FR), Catholic University of Korea (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.