Correcting Ionospheric Faraday Rotation for the VLA and MeerKAT

Abstract We report here on studies to determine the accuracy of estimated corrections of Ionospheric Faraday Rotation Measure (IFRM) using observations of the Moon with the Very Large Array (VLA) and MeerKAT telescopes. To estimate the IFRM requires an estimate of the total electron content along the line of sight to the observed sources (the so-called Slant Total Electron Content, or STEC). Estimating the STEC requires an estimate of the global 2D map of Vertical Total Electron Content (VTEC) along with the ray path from the telescope to the source. Traditionally, these global VTEC maps have been utilized along with an assumption that the electrons are in a thin shell at a given altitude to provide an estimate of the IFRM as a function of time. We find that this traditional technique significantly overestimates the IFRM—typically by ∼0.5–1.1 rad m −2 for the VLA, and ∼−0.3rad m −2 for MeerKAT. Alternatively, the software package ALBUS utilizes raw data from nearby Global Navigation Satellite System stations, to generate a local estimate of the IFRM as a function of time. ALBUS provides considerably better estimates of the IFRM—accurate to ∼0.1 rad m −2 for both the VLA and MeerKAT, provided the stations utilized have known receiver bias values. A byproduct of our study is the establishment of the intrinsic electric vector position angle of the standard polarized calibrators 3C286 and 3C138 from 500 MHz to 50 GHz, using additional VLA observations of the Moon, Venus, and Mars.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ae503c
Primary Topic
GNSS positioning and interference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correcting Ionospheric Faraday Rotation for the VLA and MeerKAT

B. Hugo, A. Willis, Bryan Butler, E. W. Greisen et al.
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
GNSS positioning and interference
article

Correcting Ionospheric Faraday Rotation for the VLA and MeerKAT

B. Hugo, A. Willis, Bryan Butler, E. W. Greisen, R. A. Perley, Evangelia Tremou
article en

Abstract

Abstract We report here on studies to determine the accuracy of estimated corrections of Ionospheric Faraday Rotation Measure (IFRM) using observations of the Moon with the Very Large Array (VLA) and MeerKAT telescopes. To estimate the IFRM requires an estimate of the total electron content along the line of sight to the observed sources (the so-called Slant Total Electron Content, or STEC). Estimating the STEC requires an estimate of the global 2D map of Vertical Total Electron Content (VTEC) along with the ray path from the telescope to the source. Traditionally, these global VTEC maps have been utilized along with an assumption that the electrons are in a thin shell at a given altitude to provide an estimate of the IFRM as a function of time. We find that this traditional technique significantly overestimates the IFRM—typically by ∼0.5–1.1 rad m −2 for the VLA, and ∼−0.3rad m −2 for MeerKAT. Alternatively, the software package ALBUS utilizes raw data from nearby Global Navigation Satellite System stations, to generate a local estimate of the IFRM as a function of time. ALBUS provides considerably better estimates of the IFRM—accurate to ∼0.1 rad m −2 for both the VLA and MeerKAT, provided the stations utilized have known receiver bias values. A byproduct of our study is the establishment of the intrinsic electric vector position angle of the standard polarized calibrators 3C286 and 3C138 from 500 MHz to 50 GHz, using additional VLA observations of the Moon, Venus, and Mars.

The Astrophysical Journal Supplement SeriesVol. 283(2)
Rhodes University (ZA), National Radio Astronomy Observatory (US), Dominion Astrophysical Observatory (CA), South African Radio Astronomy Observatory (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
GNSS positioning and interference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.