Guo Xiang's Value Monism

Abstract: This article places the thought of the Neo-Daoist philosopher, Guo Xiang 郭象 (ca. 252–312 c.e.), within contemporary value theory. It does so in order to claim that Guo, in his commentary upon the Daoist classic, the Zhuangzi 莊子, offers a novel form of value monism, the view that there is only one basic, ultimate, or fundamental value. Guo's value monism differs from the versions of the position presently available insofar as it claims that while there is only one basic value, all other, nonbasic values somehow are this value as well. To make sense of this claim, I situate Guo within the contemporary debate between value monism and value pluralism in order to show how he offers not an existence or priority value monism, but instead what I call a "one-all value monism." I conclude by emphasizing the therapeutic motivation for Guo's metaphysical and axiological views.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy East and West
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2026.a987359
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guo Xiang's Value Monism

Jason Dockstader
Philosophy East and West
Chinese history and philosophy
article

Guo Xiang's Value Monism

Jason Dockstader
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This article places the thought of the Neo-Daoist philosopher, Guo Xiang 郭象 (ca. 252–312 c.e.), within contemporary value theory. It does so in order to claim that Guo, in his commentary upon the Daoist classic, the Zhuangzi 莊子, offers a novel form of value monism, the view that there is only one basic, ultimate, or fundamental value. Guo's value monism differs from the versions of the position presently available insofar as it claims that while there is only one basic value, all other, nonbasic values somehow are this value as well. To make sense of this claim, I situate Guo within the contemporary debate between value monism and value pluralism in order to show how he offers not an existence or priority value monism, but instead what I call a "one-all value monism." I conclude by emphasizing the therapeutic motivation for Guo's metaphysical and axiological views.

Philosophy East and WestVol. 76(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.