Exploring the Orthopaedic Surgery Match

Introduction: Orthopaedic Surgery remains one of the most competitive medical specialties to successfully match into. Historically, the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 score was a major determinant of match success. Since its conversion to pass/fail status in January 2022, uncertainty has emerged regarding how programs mentor and advise applicants. The purpose of this study was to examine the changes in Orthopaedic Surgery applicant characteristics before the transition from a scored examination (2017-2022) to a pass/fail examination (2023-2025). Methods: The authors accessed the Texas Seeking Transparency in Application to Residency survey database, which contains survey information from graduating medical students nationwide regarding residency application characteristics. Characteristics of matched versus unmatched applicants between 2017 to 2022 and 2023 to 2025 were compared. Results: A total of 1,652 Orthopaedic Surgery applicants responded to the survey from 2017 to 2025 (data collected in May 2025). Since the incorporation of a pass/fail Step 1, Step 2 scores and research productivity has increased, volunteerism has decreased, and other academic metrics have remained unchanged. Conclusions: Applicants demonstrated shifts in characteristics without a corresponding change in match rates. From 2023 to 2025, applicants bolstered Step 2 performance and research output as primary differentiators in the absence of a numerical Step 1 score. Traditional academic markers such as class rank, clerkship performance, and Alpha Omega Alpha membership remained stable, while volunteer and leadership involvement declined moderately over the same period. These findings provide evidence-based guidance for navigating the Orthopaedic Surgery selection process in the postnumerical Step 1 era.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JBJS Open Access
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.oa.25.00289
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Orthopaedic Surgery Match

Carson Keeter, Kyle Jamar, S S Gill, A K Gill et al.
JBJS Open Access
Diversity and Career in Medicine
article

Exploring the Orthopaedic Surgery Match

Carson Keeter, Kyle Jamar, S S Gill, A K Gill, V Patel, M A Gallizzi, S Garg, P G Young
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Orthopaedic Surgery remains one of the most competitive medical specialties to successfully match into. Historically, the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 score was a major determinant of match success. Since its conversion to pass/fail status in January 2022, uncertainty has emerged regarding how programs mentor and advise applicants. The purpose of this study was to examine the changes in Orthopaedic Surgery applicant characteristics before the transition from a scored examination (2017-2022) to a pass/fail examination (2023-2025). Methods: The authors accessed the Texas Seeking Transparency in Application to Residency survey database, which contains survey information from graduating medical students nationwide regarding residency application characteristics. Characteristics of matched versus unmatched applicants between 2017 to 2022 and 2023 to 2025 were compared. Results: A total of 1,652 Orthopaedic Surgery applicants responded to the survey from 2017 to 2025 (data collected in May 2025). Since the incorporation of a pass/fail Step 1, Step 2 scores and research productivity has increased, volunteerism has decreased, and other academic metrics have remained unchanged. Conclusions: Applicants demonstrated shifts in characteristics without a corresponding change in match rates. From 2023 to 2025, applicants bolstered Step 2 performance and research output as primary differentiators in the absence of a numerical Step 1 score. Traditional academic markers such as class rank, clerkship performance, and Alpha Omega Alpha membership remained stable, while volunteer and leadership involvement declined moderately over the same period. These findings provide evidence-based guidance for navigating the Orthopaedic Surgery selection process in the postnumerical Step 1 era.

JBJS Open AccessVol. 11(2)
Steadman Clinic (US), Steadman Philippon Research Institute (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.