Interdisciplinary perspectives on multi-risk Anticipatory Action

Anticipatory Action (AA) has transformed how humanitarian actors respond to forecasted crises, yet most systems remain built around single hazards. This Perspective argues that to stay effective in a world where climate, conflict, and economic shocks increasingly intersect, AA must evolve toward a multi-risk approach. Drawing on a review of 105 active frameworks in 2023 and 154 in 2024 from the Anticipation Hub’s 2024 and 2025 Global Overview Reports, expert consultations, and 17 interviews, we examine how practitioners and scientists are beginning to bridge this gap. Emerging innovations—such as multi-risk analysis informing AA design, scenario-based triggers, conflict-sensitive planning, and adaptive financing—offer promising pathways, but current systems still struggle to capture dynamic vulnerabilities and interactions between risks. Advancing AA will require embracing uncertainty and redesigning systems to learn, adapt, and act across interconnected risks—moving from anticipating single hazards to anticipating intersected crises.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
iScience
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.115618
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interdisciplinary perspectives on multi-risk Anticipatory Action

Tesse de Boer, Mirianna Budimir, Marc J. C. Van den Homberg, Robert Šakić Trogrlić et al.
iScience
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
article

Interdisciplinary perspectives on multi-risk Anticipatory Action

Tesse de Boer, Mirianna Budimir, Marc J. C. Van den Homberg, Robert Šakić Trogrlić, Andrew Kruczkiewicz, Timothy Tiggeloven, Catalina Jaime, Muhammad Fawwad, Andy Wheatley, Lindsey Jones, Rodrigo Mena, Tilly Alcayna, Brenda Lazarus, Alessia Matanó, Debora Gonzalez, Kim Kristensen, Madeline Ewbank, Edward Parkinson, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Martha M. Vogel, Christopher J. White, Evan Easton Calabria, Beth Simons, Cees Van Westen
article en

Abstract

Anticipatory Action (AA) has transformed how humanitarian actors respond to forecasted crises, yet most systems remain built around single hazards. This Perspective argues that to stay effective in a world where climate, conflict, and economic shocks increasingly intersect, AA must evolve toward a multi-risk approach. Drawing on a review of 105 active frameworks in 2023 and 154 in 2024 from the Anticipation Hub’s 2024 and 2025 Global Overview Reports, expert consultations, and 17 interviews, we examine how practitioners and scientists are beginning to bridge this gap. Emerging innovations—such as multi-risk analysis informing AA design, scenario-based triggers, conflict-sensitive planning, and adaptive financing—offer promising pathways, but current systems still struggle to capture dynamic vulnerabilities and interactions between risks. Advancing AA will require embracing uncertainty and redesigning systems to learn, adapt, and act across interconnected risks—moving from anticipating single hazards to anticipating intersected crises.

iScience
HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.