Intravenous Sedation-Analgesia versus Local Anesthesia for Patient Comfort and Pain Control During Interventional Procedures: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objective: To compare the effects of intravenous sedation‑analgesia (IVSA) versus local anesthesia (LA) on patient‑reported intraoperative comfort and pain control during elective interventional procedures. Methods: This single‑center retrospective cohort study included 1068 adults undergoing interventional procedures between January and March 2024. Patients self‑selected LA or IVSA (midazolam, sufentanil, ketorolac). Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance baseline characteristics. Primary outcomes were patient‑reported comfort and maximum pain scores (0-10 NRS). Operative time was also compared. After PSM, generalized estimating equation (GEE) models were used to compare outcomes. Sensitivity analyses included ordinal logistic regression and inverse probability weighting. Results: = 0.211). Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results. Conclusion: IVSA was associated with significantly higher intraoperative patient comfort and lower pain scores compared to LA alone, without a significant difference in procedure time, though it was associated with a higher incidence of transient adverse effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drug Design Development and Therapy
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2147/dddt.s592463
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intravenous Sedation-Analgesia versus Local Anesthesia for Patient Comfort and Pain Control During Interventional Procedures: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Bin Wang, Qinjun Chu, Jing Sang, Kaikai Zhang et al.
Drug Design Development and Therapy
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Intravenous Sedation-Analgesia versus Local Anesthesia for Patient Comfort and Pain Control During Interventional Procedures: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Bin Wang, Qinjun Chu, Jing Sang, Kaikai Zhang, Liumei Li, Guanyu Yang
article en

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effects of intravenous sedation‑analgesia (IVSA) versus local anesthesia (LA) on patient‑reported intraoperative comfort and pain control during elective interventional procedures. Methods: This single‑center retrospective cohort study included 1068 adults undergoing interventional procedures between January and March 2024. Patients self‑selected LA or IVSA (midazolam, sufentanil, ketorolac). Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance baseline characteristics. Primary outcomes were patient‑reported comfort and maximum pain scores (0-10 NRS). Operative time was also compared. After PSM, generalized estimating equation (GEE) models were used to compare outcomes. Sensitivity analyses included ordinal logistic regression and inverse probability weighting. Results: = 0.211). Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results. Conclusion: IVSA was associated with significantly higher intraoperative patient comfort and lower pain scores compared to LA alone, without a significant difference in procedure time, though it was associated with a higher incidence of transient adverse effects.

Drug Design Development and TherapyVol. Volume 20
Zhengzhou Central Hospital (CN), Lanzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.