Enhancing Fermentation and Nutritional Quality of Total Mixed Ration Silages: The Impact of Forage‐to‐Concentrate Ratio and Microbial Inoculant Inclusion

This study aimed to determine the ideal roughage‐to‐concentrate ratio in total mixed ration (TMR) silage, with and without microbial inoculant addition, by evaluating fermentation characteristics, microbial populations, aerobic stability, nutritional composition, and dry matter (DM) loss. Sixty experimental silos (PVC, 150 mm internal diameter × 30 cm height; ≈5.3 L capacity) were used, with a packing density of 600 kg m −3 of fresh forage in a completely randomized design with a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement. Treatments consisted of two levels of bacterial (0 and 8g/ton) inoculants ( Lentilactobacillus plantarum : 4 × 10 10 CFU/g + Pediococcus acidilactici : 4 × 10 10 CFU/g) and three roughage‐to‐concentrate ratios (60:40, 50:50, and 40:60). The silos were opened after 60 days of storage. The roughage‐to‐concentrate ratio significantly affected effluent, gas, and total losses, as well as DM recovery. The addition of bacterial inoculants did not compromise aerobic stability during the evaluation period and resulted in lower pH values throughout the oxygen exposure phase compared to untreated silages. Silages treated with bacterial inoculants exhibited lower DM (604.00 vs. 538.21 g/kg), while presenting higher crude protein (CP) (158.04 vs. 182.51 g/kg). Additionally, inoculated silages showed reduced ammonia nitrogen concentrations (2.44 vs. 2.09% of total nitrogen) and increased concentrations of ethanol (0.086 vs. 0.113 g/kg DM), acetate (1.927 vs. 2.837 g/kg DM), propionate (0.021 vs. 0.037 g/kg DM), butyrate (0.030 vs. 0.045 g/kg DM), lactate (0.463 vs. 0.626 g/kg DM), and total volatile fatty acids (2.137 vs. 3.159 g/kg DM). The addition of bacterial inoculants increased anaerobic and aerobic bacterial counts while reducing fungal and mold populations. It was concluded that the 50:50 roughage‐to‐concentrate ratio, when combined with the use of a microbial inoculant, was optimal for the production of TMR silage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jag2.70060
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Fermentation and Nutritional Quality of Total Mixed Ration Silages: The Impact of Forage‐to‐Concentrate Ratio and Microbial Inoculant Inclusion

J. R. Gandra, Caio S. Takiya, Tiago Antônio Del Valle, Cibeli A. Pedrini et al.
New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Enhancing Fermentation and Nutritional Quality of Total Mixed Ration Silages: The Impact of Forage‐to‐Concentrate Ratio and Microbial Inoculant Inclusion

J. R. Gandra, Caio S. Takiya, Tiago Antônio Del Valle, Cibeli A. Pedrini, Érika R. S. Gandra, Wallison R. F. Vasconcelos, Kálita P. Rosa, Beatriz V. Ribeiro, Rafael H. T. B. Goes, Euclides R. Oliveira
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the ideal roughage‐to‐concentrate ratio in total mixed ration (TMR) silage, with and without microbial inoculant addition, by evaluating fermentation characteristics, microbial populations, aerobic stability, nutritional composition, and dry matter (DM) loss. Sixty experimental silos (PVC, 150 mm internal diameter × 30 cm height; ≈5.3 L capacity) were used, with a packing density of 600 kg m −3 of fresh forage in a completely randomized design with a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement. Treatments consisted of two levels of bacterial (0 and 8g/ton) inoculants ( Lentilactobacillus plantarum : 4 × 10 10 CFU/g + Pediococcus acidilactici : 4 × 10 10 CFU/g) and three roughage‐to‐concentrate ratios (60:40, 50:50, and 40:60). The silos were opened after 60 days of storage. The roughage‐to‐concentrate ratio significantly affected effluent, gas, and total losses, as well as DM recovery. The addition of bacterial inoculants did not compromise aerobic stability during the evaluation period and resulted in lower pH values throughout the oxygen exposure phase compared to untreated silages. Silages treated with bacterial inoculants exhibited lower DM (604.00 vs. 538.21 g/kg), while presenting higher crude protein (CP) (158.04 vs. 182.51 g/kg). Additionally, inoculated silages showed reduced ammonia nitrogen concentrations (2.44 vs. 2.09% of total nitrogen) and increased concentrations of ethanol (0.086 vs. 0.113 g/kg DM), acetate (1.927 vs. 2.837 g/kg DM), propionate (0.021 vs. 0.037 g/kg DM), butyrate (0.030 vs. 0.045 g/kg DM), lactate (0.463 vs. 0.626 g/kg DM), and total volatile fatty acids (2.137 vs. 3.159 g/kg DM). The addition of bacterial inoculants increased anaerobic and aerobic bacterial counts while reducing fungal and mold populations. It was concluded that the 50:50 roughage‐to‐concentrate ratio, when combined with the use of a microbial inoculant, was optimal for the production of TMR silage.

New Zealand Journal of Agricultural ResearchVol. 69(2)
Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (BR), Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados (BR), Universidade Federal do Sul e Sudeste do Pará (BR), Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (BR), Faculdade de Pato Branco (BR), Universidade Federal do Amazonas (BR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.