Evaluating Perceived Value of Pharmacogenomic Testing After a Personalized Therapeutics Clinic Consultation

Pharmacogenomics (PGx) offers patients personalized treatment by guiding medication selection and dosing based on their genetic profiles. However, widespread clinical implementation remains limited, in part due to patient and provider concerns about cost and willingness to pay (WTP). This study evaluated whether an outpatient clinical consultation that educates patients on their PGx results influences their WTP for PGx testing. As part of the PROTECT-Rx trial at the University of Chicago, high-risk patients received free PGx testing and a virtual consultation at the Personalized Therapeutics Clinic (PTC). Patients completed pre- and post-visit surveys assessing PGx knowledge and WTP. Of 129 patients who had completed a PTC visit as of 1/2025, 76 completed both the PTC visit and surveys. WTP for PGx testing increased significantly from 68% pre-visit to 83% post-visit (p = 0.029). After controlling for social vulnerability, patients who had at least one cautionary or high-risk PGx result were nearly 3 times more likely to report higher willingness-to-pay (OR 2.76, p = 0.037). A single PGx consultation with review of personal results significantly increases patients' WTP for testing, particularly among those with actionable PGx results. Understanding individual risk and the relevance of PGx enhances perceived value, suggesting that patient education is an important component in the broader adoption of pharmacogenomic testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Translational Science
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.70537
Primary Topic
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Perceived Value of Pharmacogenomic Testing After a Personalized Therapeutics Clinic Consultation

T J Chen, Clarence W. Chan, Amanda S. Andriessen, Matthew Jack et al.
Clinical and Translational Science
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
article

Evaluating Perceived Value of Pharmacogenomic Testing After a Personalized Therapeutics Clinic Consultation

T J Chen, Clarence W. Chan, Amanda S. Andriessen, Matthew Jack, Larry House, Mark J. Ratain, Kiang-Teck Yeo, David L. George, Peter H. O'Donnell
article en

Abstract

Pharmacogenomics (PGx) offers patients personalized treatment by guiding medication selection and dosing based on their genetic profiles. However, widespread clinical implementation remains limited, in part due to patient and provider concerns about cost and willingness to pay (WTP). This study evaluated whether an outpatient clinical consultation that educates patients on their PGx results influences their WTP for PGx testing. As part of the PROTECT-Rx trial at the University of Chicago, high-risk patients received free PGx testing and a virtual consultation at the Personalized Therapeutics Clinic (PTC). Patients completed pre- and post-visit surveys assessing PGx knowledge and WTP. Of 129 patients who had completed a PTC visit as of 1/2025, 76 completed both the PTC visit and surveys. WTP for PGx testing increased significantly from 68% pre-visit to 83% post-visit (p = 0.029). After controlling for social vulnerability, patients who had at least one cautionary or high-risk PGx result were nearly 3 times more likely to report higher willingness-to-pay (OR 2.76, p = 0.037). A single PGx consultation with review of personal results significantly increases patients' WTP for testing, particularly among those with actionable PGx results. Understanding individual risk and the relevance of PGx enhances perceived value, suggesting that patient education is an important component in the broader adoption of pharmacogenomic testing.

Clinical and Translational ScienceVol. 19(4)
University of Chicago (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.