Diagnostic performance of salivary markers of Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review

High heterogeneity of diagnostic accuracy have been reported for salivary markers of Alzheimer's disease (AD), but the reasons remain unclear. This systematic review aims to evaluate the potential sources of heterogeneity in the diagnostic performance of salivary biomarkers for the identification of AD. We systematically reviewed four databases for studies from inception to 2025. We evaluated biomarker sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Of 3118 studies, 18 met the inclusion criteria. AUC data were available only for amyloid beta (Aβ)42 and lactoferrin. Pre-analytical properties were a major source of heterogeneity, comprehending prior orientation, time of collection, recipient material, and centrifugation methods. The main source of variability likely stems from substantial differences in pre-analytical procedures across studies. Further studies on salivary biomarkers in AD implementing standardized protocols are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.71248
Primary Topic
Salivary Gland Disorders and Functions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic performance of salivary markers of Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review

Amanda Muliterno Domingues Lourenço de Lima, Priscilla Vendramini Borelli, Pamela C L. Ferreira, Tharick Ali Pascoal et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Salivary Gland Disorders and Functions
article

Diagnostic performance of salivary markers of Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review

Amanda Muliterno Domingues Lourenço de Lima, Priscilla Vendramini Borelli, Pamela C L. Ferreira, Tharick Ali Pascoal, Leonardo Machado, Eduardo R Zimmer, Bruna Bellaver, Giovanna Carello‐Collar, Nicholas J. Ashton, Wyllians Vendramini Borelli, Andrea L. Benedet
article en

Abstract

High heterogeneity of diagnostic accuracy have been reported for salivary markers of Alzheimer's disease (AD), but the reasons remain unclear. This systematic review aims to evaluate the potential sources of heterogeneity in the diagnostic performance of salivary biomarkers for the identification of AD. We systematically reviewed four databases for studies from inception to 2025. We evaluated biomarker sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Of 3118 studies, 18 met the inclusion criteria. AUC data were available only for amyloid beta (Aβ)42 and lactoferrin. Pre-analytical properties were a major source of heterogeneity, comprehending prior orientation, time of collection, recipient material, and centrifugation methods. The main source of variability likely stems from substantial differences in pre-analytical procedures across studies. Further studies on salivary biomarkers in AD implementing standardized protocols are warranted.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 22(4)
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), University of Arizona (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), Instituto do Cérebro (BR), Hospital Moinhos de Vento (BR), Banner Sun Health Research Institute (US), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), McGill University (CA), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Alzheimer's Association, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia para Excitotoxicidade e Neuroproteção, Instituto Serrapilheira, National Institute on Aging
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Salivary Gland Disorders and Functions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.