Failure Modes in Agentic AI Systems: A Framework for Graceful Degradation and Human Handoff Design

This industry white paper explores the failure modes of production AI agents across enterprise environments, including HRTech, HealthTech, logistics, and customer operations. Drawing on primary research from RAND (2024), McKinsey (2025), Gartner (2025), PwC (2025), S&P Global (2025), and Maxim AI (2025), the paper identifies six core failure modes that account for the majority of AI deployment breakdowns, including scope misalignment, lack of observability, data drift, and confidence miscalibration. The paper proposes a three-layer resilience framework for production-grade AI systems:1. Graceful Degradation2. Observable Behaviour3. Human Handoff Design It argues that AI agent reliability is not a model problem, but a system design problem. Organisations that invest in failure design build AI systems that are more resilient, transparent, and trustworthy. This work is intended for CTOs, AI engineers, product leaders, and enterprise decision-makers building or deploying agentic AI systems in production.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19343490
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Failure Modes in Agentic AI Systems: A Framework for Graceful Degradation and Human Handoff Design

Diwesh Saxena
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Failure Modes in Agentic AI Systems: A Framework for Graceful Degradation and Human Handoff Design

Diwesh Saxena
article en

Abstract

This industry white paper explores the failure modes of production AI agents across enterprise environments, including HRTech, HealthTech, logistics, and customer operations. Drawing on primary research from RAND (2024), McKinsey (2025), Gartner (2025), PwC (2025), S&P Global (2025), and Maxim AI (2025), the paper identifies six core failure modes that account for the majority of AI deployment breakdowns, including scope misalignment, lack of observability, data drift, and confidence miscalibration. The paper proposes a three-layer resilience framework for production-grade AI systems:1. Graceful Degradation2. Observable Behaviour3. Human Handoff Design It argues that AI agent reliability is not a model problem, but a system design problem. Organisations that invest in failure design build AI systems that are more resilient, transparent, and trustworthy. This work is intended for CTOs, AI engineers, product leaders, and enterprise decision-makers building or deploying agentic AI systems in production.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Failure Modes in Agentic AI Systems: A Framework for Graceful Degradation and Human Handoff Design — Diwesh Saxena · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS