Social Support and Employee Mental Health: A Meta-Synthesis and Theoretical Framework

Social support is widely promoted as a key organizational response to employee mental health challenges, yet management research has often overlooked how different sources of support—such as coworkers, line managers, senior leadership, and professional service providers—vary in their effects on employee recovery. This oversight is especially consequential for employees managing common, diagnosable mental health conditions for whom recovery depends on changes in maladaptive cognitive and behavioral processes that are frequently activated in work contexts. To address this limitation, we conducted an interdisciplinary meta-synthesis of 96 review articles spanning management, clinical psychology, psychiatry, and occupational health. Anchored in Beck and Haigh’s Generic Cognitive Model, we develop the Integrated Work Support Model (IWSM), which explains how distinct sources of social support influence activating work situations, maladaptive beliefs, and maladaptive behaviors over time for employees with common mental health conditions. Our synthesis distinguishes the roles of primary, secondary, and tertiary interventions, clarifying when organizational actors can mitigate triggering work conditions, when clinical expertise from professional service providers is required to directly change maladaptive processes, and how social support from actors internal to the organization can enhance—but not substitute for—therapeutic intervention. By integrating clinical theory with management scholarship, this review advances a process-based understanding of social support, specifies role-differentiated responsibilities for organizational actors and professional service providers, and offers actionable guidance for designing social support systems that promote recovery while avoiding unintended harm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063261433560
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social Support and Employee Mental Health: A Meta-Synthesis and Theoretical Framework

Nathan Black, Misha Mariam, Ekonkar Kaur
Journal of Management
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

Social Support and Employee Mental Health: A Meta-Synthesis and Theoretical Framework

Nathan Black, Misha Mariam, Ekonkar Kaur
article en

Abstract

Social support is widely promoted as a key organizational response to employee mental health challenges, yet management research has often overlooked how different sources of support—such as coworkers, line managers, senior leadership, and professional service providers—vary in their effects on employee recovery. This oversight is especially consequential for employees managing common, diagnosable mental health conditions for whom recovery depends on changes in maladaptive cognitive and behavioral processes that are frequently activated in work contexts. To address this limitation, we conducted an interdisciplinary meta-synthesis of 96 review articles spanning management, clinical psychology, psychiatry, and occupational health. Anchored in Beck and Haigh’s Generic Cognitive Model, we develop the Integrated Work Support Model (IWSM), which explains how distinct sources of social support influence activating work situations, maladaptive beliefs, and maladaptive behaviors over time for employees with common mental health conditions. Our synthesis distinguishes the roles of primary, secondary, and tertiary interventions, clarifying when organizational actors can mitigate triggering work conditions, when clinical expertise from professional service providers is required to directly change maladaptive processes, and how social support from actors internal to the organization can enhance—but not substitute for—therapeutic intervention. By integrating clinical theory with management scholarship, this review advances a process-based understanding of social support, specifies role-differentiated responsibilities for organizational actors and professional service providers, and offers actionable guidance for designing social support systems that promote recovery while avoiding unintended harm.

Journal of Management
University of Washington (US), University of Washington Bothell (US), University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US), University of Oklahoma (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.