Pragmatics of spatial descriptions: Sign language loci

Abstract In many areas in linguistic study it is difficult to decide where the study of language ends and the study of other aspects of human cognition begins. In this article, we discuss a particularly striking case of this, the use of the signing space (loci) for marking linguistic relations. The use of loci in the nominal and verbal domains has received a wide range of analyses, from those considering loci to be abstract linguistic mechanisms such as semantic indices and syntactic agreement to those considering them to be making use of nonlinguistic mechanisms such as spatial cognition. We defend the view that the use of loci is both fundamentally linguistic (they are modifiers) and fundamentally spatial (they express an association with space), providing possible descriptive content in both the verbal and the nominal domain. This analysis allows for a uniform account of loci use in the two linguistic domains and accounts for an important, yet less noticed, property of loci, which is that their distribution is pragmatically conditioned for the purpose of disambiguation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0097850725000025
Primary Topic
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pragmatics of spatial descriptions: Sign language loci

Dorothy Ahn, Annemarie Kocab, Kathryn Davidson
Language
Hearing Impairment and Communication
article

Pragmatics of spatial descriptions: Sign language loci

Dorothy Ahn, Annemarie Kocab, Kathryn Davidson
article en

Abstract

Abstract In many areas in linguistic study it is difficult to decide where the study of language ends and the study of other aspects of human cognition begins. In this article, we discuss a particularly striking case of this, the use of the signing space (loci) for marking linguistic relations. The use of loci in the nominal and verbal domains has received a wide range of analyses, from those considering loci to be abstract linguistic mechanisms such as semantic indices and syntactic agreement to those considering them to be making use of nonlinguistic mechanisms such as spatial cognition. We defend the view that the use of loci is both fundamentally linguistic (they are modifiers) and fundamentally spatial (they express an association with space), providing possible descriptive content in both the verbal and the nominal domain. This analysis allows for a uniform account of loci use in the two linguistic domains and accounts for an important, yet less noticed, property of loci, which is that their distribution is pragmatically conditioned for the purpose of disambiguation.

Language
Johns Hopkins University (US), Harvard University Press (US), Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Hearing Impairment and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.