Investigating and Cross-Validating Alternative Factor Structures of the BASC-3 BESS TRA-C/A

Universal screening of students’ social, emotional, and behavioral needs requires psychometrically sound tools to support timely intervention. The BASC-3 BESS Teacher Form–Child/Adolescent is widely used for this purpose, yet independent evaluations of the form are limited and often do not test alternative factor structures beyond those stated in the manual. This study examined four factorial models using data from 5,150 K–5 students rated by 278 teachers across 10 elementary schools in two Southeastern states. The sample was randomly divided into a development ( n = 2,727) and validation ( n = 2,423) group. Model fit was tested in the development sample and cross-validated in the second. Results showed the bifactor model, with two correlated residual pairs, provided the best fit in both samples. Reliability indicators supported well-defined constructs in the bifactor model, though Externalizing Risk and Adaptive Skills Risk subscales explained only marginal variance. Implications for improving these subscales and future practice are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829261439466
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating and Cross-Validating Alternative Factor Structures of the BASC-3 BESS TRA-C/A

Colleen A. Halliday, W. Joshua Bradley, Joseph W. Graham, Christine DiStefano et al.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
article

Investigating and Cross-Validating Alternative Factor Structures of the BASC-3 BESS TRA-C/A

Colleen A. Halliday, W. Joshua Bradley, Joseph W. Graham, Christine DiStefano, Joni W. Splett, Ning Jiang, Mark D. Weist
article en

Abstract

Universal screening of students’ social, emotional, and behavioral needs requires psychometrically sound tools to support timely intervention. The BASC-3 BESS Teacher Form–Child/Adolescent is widely used for this purpose, yet independent evaluations of the form are limited and often do not test alternative factor structures beyond those stated in the manual. This study examined four factorial models using data from 5,150 K–5 students rated by 278 teachers across 10 elementary schools in two Southeastern states. The sample was randomly divided into a development ( n = 2,727) and validation ( n = 2,423) group. Model fit was tested in the development sample and cross-validated in the second. Results showed the bifactor model, with two correlated residual pairs, provided the best fit in both samples. Reliability indicators supported well-defined constructs in the bifactor model, though Externalizing Risk and Adaptive Skills Risk subscales explained only marginal variance. Implications for improving these subscales and future practice are discussed.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
Medical University of South Carolina (US), University of South Carolina (US), University of Florida (US)
National Institute of Justice
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Investigating and Cross-Validating Alternative Factor Structures of the BASC-3 BESS TRA-C/A — Colleen A. Halliday, W. Joshua Bradley, et al. · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS