Baseline characteristics of Veterans from improving Veteran access to integrated management of back pain (AIM-Back) – an embedded pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial in the United States

OBJECTIVE: Describe baseline characteristics and representativeness of AIM-Back trial participants relative to Veterans with low back pain at participating clinics. METHODS: Veterans were referred to AIM-Back randomized care pathways and included 1) enrolled participants with data collected in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) by clinical staff with no consent required and 2) survey participants who provided informed consent with data collected via surveys by research staff. Descriptive statistics were reported. Participation to prevalence ratios (PPRs) were calculated for sex, age, race, and ethnicity by clinic to describe representativeness. RESULTS: = 799 of enrolled participants (44%) were also survey participants. More than 59% of Veterans of enrolled and survey participants had High Impact Chronic Pain and approximately 10% of enrolled participants had documented opioid use in the preceding year. Older Veterans (≥65 years) were underrepresented in the Referral cohort compared to those with LBP visits at clinics (PPRs < 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide detailed insights for participants that will be included in future analyses of care pathway effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04411420.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pain Management
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2026.2652307
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Baseline characteristics of Veterans from improving Veteran access to integrated management of back pain (AIM-Back) – an embedded pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial in the United States

Christa Tumminello, Lindsay A Ballengee, Corey B. Simon, Catherine Stanwyck et al.
Pain Management
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Baseline characteristics of Veterans from improving Veteran access to integrated management of back pain (AIM-Back) – an embedded pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial in the United States

Christa Tumminello, Lindsay A Ballengee, Corey B. Simon, Catherine Stanwyck, Jennifer C. Naylor, C. Edmisten Cook, Trevor A. Lentz, Courtni France, Ashley Choate, K. D. Allen, Joseph Leo Brothers, Rebecca North, Janet M. Grubber, Cynthia J. Coffman, Travis Linton, Heather A. King, Adam P. Goode, Francis J. Keefe, Steven Z. George, S. Nicole Hastings
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Describe baseline characteristics and representativeness of AIM-Back trial participants relative to Veterans with low back pain at participating clinics. METHODS: Veterans were referred to AIM-Back randomized care pathways and included 1) enrolled participants with data collected in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) by clinical staff with no consent required and 2) survey participants who provided informed consent with data collected via surveys by research staff. Descriptive statistics were reported. Participation to prevalence ratios (PPRs) were calculated for sex, age, race, and ethnicity by clinic to describe representativeness. RESULTS: = 799 of enrolled participants (44%) were also survey participants. More than 59% of Veterans of enrolled and survey participants had High Impact Chronic Pain and approximately 10% of enrolled participants had documented opioid use in the preceding year. Older Veterans (≥65 years) were underrepresented in the Referral cohort compared to those with LBP visits at clinics (PPRs < 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide detailed insights for participants that will be included in future analyses of care pathway effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04411420.

Pain Management
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Duke University (US), VA Boston Healthcare System (US), Durham VA Health Care System (US), Duke University Health System (US)
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, National Institutes of Health, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.