Impairment of written word production in logopenic primary progressive aphasia: dissociating phonological and orthographic contributions

Introduction: Written language impairment is a frequent but still incompletely understood feature of the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA), and although spoken language deficits have been extensively studied, less is known about the mechanisms underlying impaired written word production and the conditions under which orthographic representations become particularly vulnerable. In this study, we investigated written language processing in individuals with lvPPA using a battery of tasks designed to dissociate phonological and orthographic contributions. Methods: Twelve participants with lvPPA and thirteen healthy controls completed written picture naming, written word dictation, written non-word dictation, grapheme dictation, and a picture-based letter-in-word judgment task that probed orthographic knowledge without requiring overt written output. Results: Compared with controls, participants with lvPPA showed significant impairments in written picture naming, written word dictation, grapheme dictation, and letter-in-word judgment, whereas written non-word dictation was relatively preserved at the group level. Within grapheme dictation, vowel graphemes were disproportionately affected relative to consonants. In the letter-in-word judgment task, the largest group differences were observed in conditions requiring access to orthographic knowledge when phonological cues were non-informative. Discussion: Together, these findings indicate that written language impairment in lvPPA cannot be explained by a primary phonological deficit alone but instead reflects vulnerability of abstract orthographic representations, particularly under conditions of increased orthographic ambiguity. Identifying tasks that require access to orthographic knowledge independently of phonological support may therefore provide sensitive markers for characterizing written language impairment in lvPPA and contribute to a more precise understanding of language network dysfunction in neurodegenerative disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2026.1812997
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impairment of written word production in logopenic primary progressive aphasia: dissociating phonological and orthographic contributions

Monica Lavoie, Joël Macoir, Robert Laforce
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
article

Impairment of written word production in logopenic primary progressive aphasia: dissociating phonological and orthographic contributions

Monica Lavoie, Joël Macoir, Robert Laforce
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Written language impairment is a frequent but still incompletely understood feature of the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA), and although spoken language deficits have been extensively studied, less is known about the mechanisms underlying impaired written word production and the conditions under which orthographic representations become particularly vulnerable. In this study, we investigated written language processing in individuals with lvPPA using a battery of tasks designed to dissociate phonological and orthographic contributions. Methods: Twelve participants with lvPPA and thirteen healthy controls completed written picture naming, written word dictation, written non-word dictation, grapheme dictation, and a picture-based letter-in-word judgment task that probed orthographic knowledge without requiring overt written output. Results: Compared with controls, participants with lvPPA showed significant impairments in written picture naming, written word dictation, grapheme dictation, and letter-in-word judgment, whereas written non-word dictation was relatively preserved at the group level. Within grapheme dictation, vowel graphemes were disproportionately affected relative to consonants. In the letter-in-word judgment task, the largest group differences were observed in conditions requiring access to orthographic knowledge when phonological cues were non-informative. Discussion: Together, these findings indicate that written language impairment in lvPPA cannot be explained by a primary phonological deficit alone but instead reflects vulnerability of abstract orthographic representations, particularly under conditions of increased orthographic ambiguity. Identifying tasks that require access to orthographic knowledge independently of phonological support may therefore provide sensitive markers for characterizing written language impairment in lvPPA and contribute to a more precise understanding of language network dysfunction in neurodegenerative disease.

Frontiers in Human NeuroscienceVol. 20
Institut Interdisciplinaire d’Anthropologie du Contemporain (FR), Direction de la Recherche Fondamentale (FR), Centre de recherche cerveau et cognition (FR), Université Laval (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.