Safety and efficacy of Nordic walking training in adult patients with asthma: A pilot randomised controlled trial with a mixed-methods approach

INTRODUCTION: Nordic walking (NW) may benefit patients with asthma by enhancing functional exercise capacity and reducing symptoms, though evidence remains limited. This study assessed NW safety and effects in patients with asthma and explored their experiences. METHODS: A mixed-method two-arm, parallel, pilot randomised controlled trial was conducted in A Coruña between (July 2021 - May 2025). Adults with asthma attended three educational sessions before randomization to NW group (NWG) or control group (CG). The NWG performed NW 3 days/week, during eight weeks, at 70-85% of maximum heart rate. Both groups maintained usual care. The primary outcome was the 6-min walking distance (6MWD). Secondary outcomes included 1-min Sit-to-Stand Test, physical activity (PA) and adverse events. Experiences were explored through individual interviews. RESULTS: Thirty-four participants with asthma (mean ± SD age 45.4 ± 11.4 years, 82.4% female) were randomly allocated to NWG (n = 17) or CG (n = 17). NW adherence was 80.1 + 16.1%. No adverse effects occurred. Post-intervention, the NWG increased 6MWD by 12.1 ± 30.4 m (m) (P = .119), whereas the CG decreased by 13.6 ± 41.3m (P = .193), without significant between-groups differences (P = .067; Cohen's d = 0.7; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.-1.3). The NWG spent more time in vigorous PA compared to CG (P = .016, r = 0.4, 95% CI 0.8-52.4). All NWG participants recommended NW, citing health improvements and finding it manageable, comfortable, and implementable. CONCLUSION: Although between-groups differences were not significant, NW was safe, feasible, accessible and perceived as beneficial by individuals with asthma. Given the demonstrated safety, future studies should tailor NW intensity to fitness and asthma control levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Respiratory Medicine
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2026.108817
Primary Topic
Asthma and respiratory diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety and efficacy of Nordic walking training in adult patients with asthma: A pilot randomised controlled trial with a mixed-methods approach

María Vilanova-Pereira, Ana Lista-Paz, Qichen Deng, Anouk W. Vaes et al.
Respiratory Medicine
Asthma and respiratory diseases
article

Safety and efficacy of Nordic walking training in adult patients with asthma: A pilot randomised controlled trial with a mixed-methods approach

María Vilanova-Pereira, Ana Lista-Paz, Qichen Deng, Anouk W. Vaes, Lara Fontán García-Boente, Ane Arbillaga-Etxarri, Lore Zumeta-Olaskoaga, Margarita Barral-Fernández, Manuel Jorge Rial-Prado, Cristina Jácome, Iria Losada-García, Verónica Guerra-Fandiño, Marina Blanco-Aparicio, Martijn A. Spruit, David Garrido-Victorino
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Nordic walking (NW) may benefit patients with asthma by enhancing functional exercise capacity and reducing symptoms, though evidence remains limited. This study assessed NW safety and effects in patients with asthma and explored their experiences. METHODS: A mixed-method two-arm, parallel, pilot randomised controlled trial was conducted in A Coruña between (July 2021 - May 2025). Adults with asthma attended three educational sessions before randomization to NW group (NWG) or control group (CG). The NWG performed NW 3 days/week, during eight weeks, at 70-85% of maximum heart rate. Both groups maintained usual care. The primary outcome was the 6-min walking distance (6MWD). Secondary outcomes included 1-min Sit-to-Stand Test, physical activity (PA) and adverse events. Experiences were explored through individual interviews. RESULTS: Thirty-four participants with asthma (mean ± SD age 45.4 ± 11.4 years, 82.4% female) were randomly allocated to NWG (n = 17) or CG (n = 17). NW adherence was 80.1 + 16.1%. No adverse effects occurred. Post-intervention, the NWG increased 6MWD by 12.1 ± 30.4 m (m) (P = .119), whereas the CG decreased by 13.6 ± 41.3m (P = .193), without significant between-groups differences (P = .067; Cohen's d = 0.7; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.-1.3). The NWG spent more time in vigorous PA compared to CG (P = .016, r = 0.4, 95% CI 0.8-52.4). All NWG participants recommended NW, citing health improvements and finding it manageable, comfortable, and implementable. CONCLUSION: Although between-groups differences were not significant, NW was safe, feasible, accessible and perceived as beneficial by individuals with asthma. Given the demonstrated safety, future studies should tailor NW intensity to fitness and asthma control levels.

Respiratory MedicineVol. 256
Universidade da Coruña (ES), Universidad de Deusto (ES), Universidade do Porto (PT), Maastricht University (NL), Biogipuzkoa Health Research Institute (ES), Gerontologic Complex La Milagrosa (ES), Decision Sciences (United States) (US), Ciro (NL), Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña (ES)
Sociedad Madrileña de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica, Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica, Universidade da Coruña
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Asthma and respiratory diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.