Potential biomarkers of Ewing sarcoma identified through a Europe-wide analysis of prospectively collected samples

Clinical features, aside from disease stage, have proven insufficient to identify patients at extremely high or low risk. There are few established biological markers for EwS. The discovery of new prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers could improve our understanding of tumor heterogeneity, facilitate individual risk stratification, and aid targeted therapies. We initiated a pan-European study using formalin-fixed, prospectively collected, primary tumors prior to chemotherapy from 335 patients in two clinical trial registries, EURO-Ewing 99 and Ewing 2008, to analyze correlation and survival of ten potential prognostic biomarkers. Immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses were conducted for STEAP1, DKK2, and EZH2, while MIR34A and LGALS3BP expression was investigated by quantitative PCR. Genomic alterations, including gain of chromosome 1q, loss of ADAM3A, loss of chromosome 16q, as well as loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and percentage of the genome altered (PGA), were analyzed by FISH and/or SNP-based arrays of genomic DNA. To consider the observed variation in the number of analyzed samples per biomarker (N = 102–300), effect size measures were computed. Correlations between dichotomized biomarker expressions were generally low, except for those reflecting genomic alterations (ϕ >= 0.20 <= 0.38; P < .05). Several relevant correlations were found with clinical features of the underlying EwS patients (ϕ >= 0.20 <= 0.31; P < .05). Most promising prognostic values with clinically relevant effect sizes (OS), adjusted for known prognostic variables, were high MIR34A expression (HR = 0.29; P < .01), LOH (HR = 2.44; P < .05), and PGA (HR = 2.20; P = .05). This pan-European study identified MIR34A, LOH, and PGA as the most promising biomarkers for the prognosis of survival in a well-characterized EWS patient cohort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43071-0
Primary Topic
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Potential biomarkers of Ewing sarcoma identified through a Europe-wide analysis of prospectively collected samples

Juan Carlos Díaz Martín, Maite Blanquer-Maceiras, Katia Scotlandi, Alessandro Parra et al.
Scientific Reports
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Potential biomarkers of Ewing sarcoma identified through a Europe-wide analysis of prospectively collected samples

Juan Carlos Díaz Martín, Maite Blanquer-Maceiras, Katia Scotlandi, Alessandro Parra, Stefan Burdach, Marvin Jens, Uta Dirksen, Maximilian Kerkhoff, Piero Picci, Inken Piro, Susanne Jabar, Rosa Noguera, Katja Steiger, Günther H. S. Richter, Enrique de Alava, Andreas Ranft, Wolfgang Hartmann, Marco Gambarotti
article en

Abstract

Clinical features, aside from disease stage, have proven insufficient to identify patients at extremely high or low risk. There are few established biological markers for EwS. The discovery of new prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers could improve our understanding of tumor heterogeneity, facilitate individual risk stratification, and aid targeted therapies. We initiated a pan-European study using formalin-fixed, prospectively collected, primary tumors prior to chemotherapy from 335 patients in two clinical trial registries, EURO-Ewing 99 and Ewing 2008, to analyze correlation and survival of ten potential prognostic biomarkers. Immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses were conducted for STEAP1, DKK2, and EZH2, while MIR34A and LGALS3BP expression was investigated by quantitative PCR. Genomic alterations, including gain of chromosome 1q, loss of ADAM3A, loss of chromosome 16q, as well as loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and percentage of the genome altered (PGA), were analyzed by FISH and/or SNP-based arrays of genomic DNA. To consider the observed variation in the number of analyzed samples per biomarker (N = 102–300), effect size measures were computed. Correlations between dichotomized biomarker expressions were generally low, except for those reflecting genomic alterations (ϕ >= 0.20 <= 0.38; P < .05). Several relevant correlations were found with clinical features of the underlying EwS patients (ϕ >= 0.20 <= 0.31; P < .05). Most promising prognostic values with clinically relevant effect sizes (OS), adjusted for known prognostic variables, were high MIR34A expression (HR = 0.29; P < .01), LOH (HR = 2.44; P < .05), and PGA (HR = 2.20; P = .05). This pan-European study identified MIR34A, LOH, and PGA as the most promising biomarkers for the prognosis of survival in a well-characterized EWS patient cohort.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
German Cancer Society (DE), University Hospital Münster (DE), National Center for Tumor Diseases (DE), Essen University Hospital (DE), München Klinik (DE), Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli (IT), Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (ES), INCLIVA Health Research Institute (ES), West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen (DE), Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Universitätsklinikum Essen
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.