Unmet need for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer initiating first-line treatment: data from the prospective German tumor registry OPAL

Background: The treatment landscape for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) has evolved. However, data on implementation of novel treatment approaches in clinical routine and current real-world outcomes are limited. Patients and methods: Patients with mTNBC who initiated first-line (1L) treatment between January 2018 and August 2023 were prospectively observed within the OPAL registry. Treatment patterns, median real-world overall survival (rwOS), and progression-free survival (rwPFS) were analyzed by programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status. Results: metastatic disease. Of patients with PD-L1-positive tumors, 81.2% received 1L PD-(L)1 inhibitors ± chemotherapy. Mono-chemotherapy was the most common treatment strategy for patients with PD-L1-negative and unknown status. At database cut, 25.8% of patients died before start of second line (2L). In the total cohort, rwOS was 17.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 15.6-19.7 months] and rwPFS was 6.8 months (95% CI 5.9-7.6 months). For patients with PD-L1-positive tumors treated with PD-(L)1 inhibitors, rwOS was 23.2 months (95% CI 17.5-28.2 months) and rwPFS was 7.2 months (95% CI 6.5-9.1 months). In patients with PD-L1-negative tumors receiving chemotherapy, rwOS was 16.0 months (95% CI 13.9-20.7 months) and rwPFS was 6.3 months (95% CI 4.9-7.6 months). Conclusions: Although new treatment options have been rapidly integrated into clinical routine, chemotherapy remains standard for most patients in 1L. Survival remains poor, with at least one-quarter dying without reaching 2L. This highlights the need for novel therapies to improve mTNBC outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmorw.2026.100699
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unmet need for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer initiating first-line treatment: data from the prospective German tumor registry OPAL

L. Kruggel, A. Wöckel, A. Kuske, A. Nusch et al.
ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Unmet need for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer initiating first-line treatment: data from the prospective German tumor registry OPAL

L. Kruggel, A. Wöckel, A. Kuske, A. Nusch, M.-O. Zahn, E. Stickeler, N. Harbeck, C. Teutsch, M. Wang, T. Decker, A. Welt, K. Gratzke, M. Thill, K. Ringwald, M. Zaiss
article en

Abstract

Background: The treatment landscape for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) has evolved. However, data on implementation of novel treatment approaches in clinical routine and current real-world outcomes are limited. Patients and methods: Patients with mTNBC who initiated first-line (1L) treatment between January 2018 and August 2023 were prospectively observed within the OPAL registry. Treatment patterns, median real-world overall survival (rwOS), and progression-free survival (rwPFS) were analyzed by programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status. Results: metastatic disease. Of patients with PD-L1-positive tumors, 81.2% received 1L PD-(L)1 inhibitors ± chemotherapy. Mono-chemotherapy was the most common treatment strategy for patients with PD-L1-negative and unknown status. At database cut, 25.8% of patients died before start of second line (2L). In the total cohort, rwOS was 17.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 15.6-19.7 months] and rwPFS was 6.8 months (95% CI 5.9-7.6 months). For patients with PD-L1-positive tumors treated with PD-(L)1 inhibitors, rwOS was 23.2 months (95% CI 17.5-28.2 months) and rwPFS was 7.2 months (95% CI 6.5-9.1 months). In patients with PD-L1-negative tumors receiving chemotherapy, rwOS was 16.0 months (95% CI 13.9-20.7 months) and rwPFS was 6.3 months (95% CI 4.9-7.6 months). Conclusions: Although new treatment options have been rapidly integrated into clinical routine, chemotherapy remains standard for most patients in 1L. Survival remains poor, with at least one-quarter dying without reaching 2L. This highlights the need for novel therapies to improve mTNBC outcomes.

ESMO Real World Data and Digital OncologyVol. 12
LMU Klinikum (DE), Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE), Agaplesion Frankfurter Diakonie Kliniken (DE), Essen University Hospital (DE), Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE), Kreiskliniken Reutlingen (DE), Iomedico (Germany) (DE), Praxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie (DE), Agaplesion Markus Hospital (DE), Diagnostics for the Real World (United Kingdom) (GB), Gilead Sciences (Germany) (DE), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Lilly Deutschland, Novartis Pharma, Mundipharma Research GmbH and Co.KG
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.