Where Are They Now? An <i>Ex Post</i> Analysis of Misappropriation Fraud

ABSTRACT There are many studies that investigate asset misappropriation fraud. However, there are still unknowns around its impact on the perpetrator, the victim organization, and the organizational changes post-fraud, especially when data include relatively smaller losses (sample median of $27,000). We conducted a survey of employees with knowledge of misappropriation fraud at their workplace to better understand this issue. We measured indirect costs of fraud and investigated the opportunities that led to it. Further, we investigated how companies handled the investigation and remediation of employee oversight. Overall, even when direct costs of fraud are low, indirect costs to the perpetrator and to the victim organization can be significant. Surprisingly, only 74 percent of our respondents reported oversight remediation post-fraud. Companies should prioritize oversight remediation to prevent similar frauds from recurring. Our findings indicate that organizational use of root cause analysis after fraud leads to implementation of better oversight measures. Data Availability: Data are available upon request. JEL Classifications: M49.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forensic Accounting Research
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/jfar-2025-006
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Where Are They Now? An Ex Post Analysis of Misappropriation Fraud

Alyssa S. J. Ong, Jason M. Jordan
Journal of Forensic Accounting Research
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Where Are They Now? An Ex Post Analysis of Misappropriation Fraud

Alyssa S. J. Ong, Jason M. Jordan
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT There are many studies that investigate asset misappropriation fraud. However, there are still unknowns around its impact on the perpetrator, the victim organization, and the organizational changes post-fraud, especially when data include relatively smaller losses (sample median of $27,000). We conducted a survey of employees with knowledge of misappropriation fraud at their workplace to better understand this issue. We measured indirect costs of fraud and investigated the opportunities that led to it. Further, we investigated how companies handled the investigation and remediation of employee oversight. Overall, even when direct costs of fraud are low, indirect costs to the perpetrator and to the victim organization can be significant. Surprisingly, only 74 percent of our respondents reported oversight remediation post-fraud. Companies should prioritize oversight remediation to prevent similar frauds from recurring. Our findings indicate that organizational use of root cause analysis after fraud leads to implementation of better oversight measures. Data Availability: Data are available upon request. JEL Classifications: M49.

Journal of Forensic Accounting Research
Pepperdine University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.