The Impact of Fertility Preservation Interventions on Fertility Decision Making in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Clinical evidence guiding the fertility decisions of reproductive-age patients with breast cancer remains limited. No study has reported the impact of fertility preservation interventions on the decision-making process of patients with breast cancer. Fertility preservation interventions reduce fertility decision-making conflicts and address psychological issues in patients with breast cancer. AIMS: We evaluated the effectiveness of fertility preservation interventions, including educational materials, decision aids, and counseling models in facilitating informed fertility-related decision-making among reproductive-age patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Additionally, we examined the influence of these interventions on patients' psychological state. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 20, 2025. Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled trials that reported the effects of fertility preservation interventions on fertility decision making among patients with breast cancer were included. Two authors independently screened the studies, assessed their quality, and extracted the data. Bias risk was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. RESULTS: The interventions were categorized as decision aids, educational interventions, and psychological interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Fertility preservation interventions significantly enhanced the fertility knowledge of patients with breast cancer, particularly interventions such as decision aids. However, no single intervention demonstrated distinct superiority specifically in terms of mitigating decisional conflict and alleviating patients' psychological distress. Fertility preservation interventions, when combined with specialist consultation, enhanced fertility-related knowledge and had a positive impact on fertility decision making. High-quality research is recommended to enrich fertility preservation interventions and encourage multidisciplinary teamwork to enhance fertility decision-making. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD420251007625).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psycho-Oncology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70452
Primary Topic
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Fertility Preservation Interventions on Fertility Decision Making in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

Xuefeng Liu, Xia Duan, Siying Zhang, Tingting Wang et al.
Psycho-Oncology
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
article

The Impact of Fertility Preservation Interventions on Fertility Decision Making in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

Xuefeng Liu, Xia Duan, Siying Zhang, Tingting Wang, Chunzi Wan, Liangjing Ruan, Jinjin Cen
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical evidence guiding the fertility decisions of reproductive-age patients with breast cancer remains limited. No study has reported the impact of fertility preservation interventions on the decision-making process of patients with breast cancer. Fertility preservation interventions reduce fertility decision-making conflicts and address psychological issues in patients with breast cancer. AIMS: We evaluated the effectiveness of fertility preservation interventions, including educational materials, decision aids, and counseling models in facilitating informed fertility-related decision-making among reproductive-age patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Additionally, we examined the influence of these interventions on patients' psychological state. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 20, 2025. Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled trials that reported the effects of fertility preservation interventions on fertility decision making among patients with breast cancer were included. Two authors independently screened the studies, assessed their quality, and extracted the data. Bias risk was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. RESULTS: The interventions were categorized as decision aids, educational interventions, and psychological interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Fertility preservation interventions significantly enhanced the fertility knowledge of patients with breast cancer, particularly interventions such as decision aids. However, no single intervention demonstrated distinct superiority specifically in terms of mitigating decisional conflict and alleviating patients' psychological distress. Fertility preservation interventions, when combined with specialist consultation, enhanced fertility-related knowledge and had a positive impact on fertility decision making. High-quality research is recommended to enrich fertility preservation interventions and encourage multidisciplinary teamwork to enhance fertility decision-making. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD420251007625).

Psycho-OncologyVol. 35(4)
Department of Health (CN), Renji Hospital (CN), Metropolitan University (BD), Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital (CN)
Shanghai Municipal Health Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.