Dosimetric and Delivery Assessment of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using Flattened and Unflattened Beams for the Single-Isocenter Treatment of Multiple Liver Targets

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly applied in the management of liver cancers. Flattening filter-free (FFF) beams, which offer higher dose rates, enable faster delivery and improved patient comfort. This retrospective study compares the dosimetric and delivery characteristics of SBRT using FFF and conventional flattened beams for the treatment of multiple liver targets. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with 2-11 hepatic targets were treated using a single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique. Treatment plans were created for 6X, 6FFF, and 10FFF photon beams, with prescription doses ranging from 27.5 Gy to 50 Gy in 5 fractions. Plan evaluation metrics included Planning Target Volume (PTV) coverage (V95%, V98%, V100%), mean liver dose (MLD), normal liver volume receiving <15 Gy, and maximum doses to Organs at Risk (OARs). Delivery parameters were assessed by gamma passing rate, monitor units (MU), and beam-on time (BOT). Repeated-measures ANOVA, with post-hoc least significant difference (LSD) testing, was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Comparable Planning Target Volume (PTV) coverage was achieved with all beam modalities. No statistically significant differences were noted in mean liver dose (MLD), normal liver volume receiving <15 Gy, or other Organ at Risk (OAR) doses, except for lower spinal cord doses with FFF beams (p = 0.003). The 2%/2 mm gamma passing rate for 6FFF was 1% lower than for 6X and 10FFF. Monitor unit (MU) values were higher for 6FFF (4.3%) and 10FFF (1.5%) compared with 6X (p = 0.01). Beam-on time (BOT) was significantly shorter with 6FFF (3.8 ± 0.28 min) and 10FFF (3.8 ± 0.30 min) relative to 6X (5.1 ± 0.22 min) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Flattening filter-free (FFF) beams reduce beam-on time (BOT), providing an advantage for breath-hold techniques. However, despite the higher dose rate of 10FFF, no additional reduction in overall treatment time was observed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31557/apjcp.2026.27.4.1451
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dosimetric and Delivery Assessment of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using Flattened and Unflattened Beams for the Single-Isocenter Treatment of Multiple Liver Targets

Sudesh ., Shine N. S., Nithin K., Jayadevan P. M. et al.
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

Dosimetric and Delivery Assessment of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using Flattened and Unflattened Beams for the Single-Isocenter Treatment of Multiple Liver Targets

Sudesh ., Shine N. S., Nithin K., Jayadevan P. M., Dhanya .
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly applied in the management of liver cancers. Flattening filter-free (FFF) beams, which offer higher dose rates, enable faster delivery and improved patient comfort. This retrospective study compares the dosimetric and delivery characteristics of SBRT using FFF and conventional flattened beams for the treatment of multiple liver targets. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with 2-11 hepatic targets were treated using a single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique. Treatment plans were created for 6X, 6FFF, and 10FFF photon beams, with prescription doses ranging from 27.5 Gy to 50 Gy in 5 fractions. Plan evaluation metrics included Planning Target Volume (PTV) coverage (V95%, V98%, V100%), mean liver dose (MLD), normal liver volume receiving <15 Gy, and maximum doses to Organs at Risk (OARs). Delivery parameters were assessed by gamma passing rate, monitor units (MU), and beam-on time (BOT). Repeated-measures ANOVA, with post-hoc least significant difference (LSD) testing, was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Comparable Planning Target Volume (PTV) coverage was achieved with all beam modalities. No statistically significant differences were noted in mean liver dose (MLD), normal liver volume receiving <15 Gy, or other Organ at Risk (OAR) doses, except for lower spinal cord doses with FFF beams (p = 0.003). The 2%/2 mm gamma passing rate for 6FFF was 1% lower than for 6X and 10FFF. Monitor unit (MU) values were higher for 6FFF (4.3%) and 10FFF (1.5%) compared with 6X (p = 0.01). Beam-on time (BOT) was significantly shorter with 6FFF (3.8 ± 0.28 min) and 10FFF (3.8 ± 0.30 min) relative to 6X (5.1 ± 0.22 min) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Flattening filter-free (FFF) beams reduce beam-on time (BOT), providing an advantage for breath-hold techniques. However, despite the higher dose rate of 10FFF, no additional reduction in overall treatment time was observed.

Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer PreventionVol. 27(4)
Banasthali University (IN), Rajagiri Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.