Understanding and Mitigating Unintended Bias in Medical AI Systems

Complex AI technologies, including generative AI models, are being increasingly introduced in clinical settings without corresponding tools or methods to systematically evaluate them for the unintended biases they may exhibit. Current literature extensively documents the risks of explicit and implicit biases by healthcare providers, but actionable guidance for identifying and mitigating biases in the AI systems used by providers remains lacking. Tackling unintended bias in medical AI is challenging but vital for building transparency and trust in healthcare systems increasingly shaped by these technologies.To address this absence of actionable guidance, we introduce the Unintended Bias Risk Matrix (UBRM), a tool that helps identify risks of unintended bias in AI systems. The UBRM identifies key risk factors, grounded in prior literature and our empirical experience testing AI systems for bias. The UBRM guides developers and deployers through deriving a use-case- and context-specific unintended bias risk assessment for the AI system. This assessment serves to inform organizations, based on their risk appetite and AI governance policies, which AI systems need to be carefully monitored and tested for unintended biases. For illustration, we apply the UBRM to two common medical AI use cases: one traditional machine learning application and one large language model (LLM) application. These use cases demonstrate the practical application of the UBRM in addressing and mitigating unintended bias in medical AI systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Harvard Data Science Review
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.59ca6018
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding and Mitigating Unintended Bias in Medical AI Systems

Danny Tobey, Suresh Balu, Jee Young Kim, Zev J. Eigen et al.
Harvard Data Science Review
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Understanding and Mitigating Unintended Bias in Medical AI Systems

Danny Tobey, Suresh Balu, Jee Young Kim, Zev J. Eigen, Bogdana Rakova, Mark Sendak, Coran Darling, Divya Sharma, Sam Tyner-Monroe, Kyle Kloeppel
article en

Abstract

Complex AI technologies, including generative AI models, are being increasingly introduced in clinical settings without corresponding tools or methods to systematically evaluate them for the unintended biases they may exhibit. Current literature extensively documents the risks of explicit and implicit biases by healthcare providers, but actionable guidance for identifying and mitigating biases in the AI systems used by providers remains lacking. Tackling unintended bias in medical AI is challenging but vital for building transparency and trust in healthcare systems increasingly shaped by these technologies.To address this absence of actionable guidance, we introduce the Unintended Bias Risk Matrix (UBRM), a tool that helps identify risks of unintended bias in AI systems. The UBRM identifies key risk factors, grounded in prior literature and our empirical experience testing AI systems for bias. The UBRM guides developers and deployers through deriving a use-case- and context-specific unintended bias risk assessment for the AI system. This assessment serves to inform organizations, based on their risk appetite and AI governance policies, which AI systems need to be carefully monitored and tested for unintended biases. For illustration, we apply the UBRM to two common medical AI use cases: one traditional machine learning application and one large language model (LLM) application. These use cases demonstrate the practical application of the UBRM in addressing and mitigating unintended bias in medical AI systems.

Harvard Data Science ReviewVol. 8(2)
EP Analytics (United States) (US), Manatt, Phelps & Phillips (United States) (US), Duke Institute for Health Innovation (US), Durham County Department of Public Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.