Prevalence of Medication Errors in the Medicine Department of a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital: A Cross-sectional Study

Introduction: Medication Errors (ME) pose a major global threat to patient safety, causing adverse drug effects, increased morbidity and mortality, and higher healthcare costs while eroding patient trust. In the Medicine Department of a tertiary care teaching hospital in Eastern India, the prevalence of MEs lacks comprehensive documentation, thereby hindering targeted interventions. Aim: To evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of MEs within the Medicine Department of a tertiary care teaching hospital. Materials and Methods: This Institution-based cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the Departments of General Medicine and Pharmacology of a tertiary care teaching hospital of MGM Medical College and LSK Hospital, Kishanganj, Bihar, India, from March 2024 to February 2025. Data from 3,056 patient cases were collected through direct observation, covering prescribing, administration, transcription, and dispensing errors. Severity was classified using the National Coordinating Council for ME Reporting and Prevention’s (NCCMERP) Index. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and subgroup analyses with SPSS version 21.0 and Microsoft Excel, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Overall ME prevalence was 9.26% (283/3,056 cases), highest in the 51-60 years age group (31.8%). Prescribing errors dominated 131 cases (46.3%), followed by administration 63 (22.3%), transcription (50, 17.7%), and dispensation (38, 13.6%) errors- all highly significant (p<0.001). Key prescribing factors: error-prone abbreviations (14%) and illegible handwriting (12%). Most errors 164 cases, (58%) were categorised as “Error, No Harm” (Categories B–D) according to the NCC MERP index. Antibiotics (15%), Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) (12%),and multivitamins (11%) were most frequently associated with medication errors. Conclusion: Prescription errors are prevalent in this setting, especially among middle-aged patients. Targeted interventionsimproving prescription legibility, abbreviation use, transcription, and administration- are crucial. Collaborative efforts focusing on antibiotics and analgesics will enhance safety and reduce adverse outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2026/81341.23243
Primary Topic
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence of Medication Errors in the Medicine Department of a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital: A Cross-sectional Study

Nikhil Era, Uttam Kumar Paul, Pritama Paul, Abhishek Bhattacharjee
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
article

Prevalence of Medication Errors in the Medicine Department of a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital: A Cross-sectional Study

Nikhil Era, Uttam Kumar Paul, Pritama Paul, Abhishek Bhattacharjee
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Medication Errors (ME) pose a major global threat to patient safety, causing adverse drug effects, increased morbidity and mortality, and higher healthcare costs while eroding patient trust. In the Medicine Department of a tertiary care teaching hospital in Eastern India, the prevalence of MEs lacks comprehensive documentation, thereby hindering targeted interventions. Aim: To evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of MEs within the Medicine Department of a tertiary care teaching hospital. Materials and Methods: This Institution-based cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the Departments of General Medicine and Pharmacology of a tertiary care teaching hospital of MGM Medical College and LSK Hospital, Kishanganj, Bihar, India, from March 2024 to February 2025. Data from 3,056 patient cases were collected through direct observation, covering prescribing, administration, transcription, and dispensing errors. Severity was classified using the National Coordinating Council for ME Reporting and Prevention’s (NCCMERP) Index. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and subgroup analyses with SPSS version 21.0 and Microsoft Excel, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Overall ME prevalence was 9.26% (283/3,056 cases), highest in the 51-60 years age group (31.8%). Prescribing errors dominated 131 cases (46.3%), followed by administration 63 (22.3%), transcription (50, 17.7%), and dispensation (38, 13.6%) errors- all highly significant (p<0.001). Key prescribing factors: error-prone abbreviations (14%) and illegible handwriting (12%). Most errors 164 cases, (58%) were categorised as “Error, No Harm” (Categories B–D) according to the NCC MERP index. Antibiotics (15%), Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) (12%),and multivitamins (11%) were most frequently associated with medication errors. Conclusion: Prescription errors are prevalent in this setting, especially among middle-aged patients. Targeted interventionsimproving prescription legibility, abbreviation use, transcription, and administration- are crucial. Collaborative efforts focusing on antibiotics and analgesics will enhance safety and reduce adverse outcomes.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.