Clinical Outcome Assessment Endpoints in Nephrotic Syndrome Drug Development: Research Partner Feedback on Patient-Centered Trial Design

Introduction: Nephrotic syndrome (NS) clinical trials often rely on biomarkers or clinical measures as primary endpoints, but these may not fully capture the treatment benefits that matter most to patients. Edema-related swelling, a central manifestation of NS, profoundly affects patients' health-related quality of life, including physical function, severe physical and mental symptoms, and ability to participate in routine activities, highlighting the need for clinical outcome assessments (COAs) that directly measure its severity and impact. The PREPARing a clinical outcomes assessment set for Nephrotic Syndrome (Prepare-NS) project, supported by the United States Food and Drug Administration's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Pilot Grant Program, aims to address this unmet need. Methods: We conducted qualitative interviews with and surveyed clinical trialists from industry, academia, and patient advocacy organizations. Each queried participants on how COAs, including patient- and observer-reported outcomes, could be used to demonstrate treatment benefit in trials. Participants were asked about preferences for timing, frequency, and format of COA assessment, as well as how COA-based endpoints could best capture swelling impacts, and how these might relate to other trial endpoints. Results: Participants expressed strong support for COA-based endpoints to complement clinical or biomarker endpoints, noting that the impact of disease as represented by proteinuria does not fully capture potential treatment benefit to patients. We identified multiple endpoints to operationalize swelling COAs in clinical trials. Additional key considerations included optimal timing of assessments, feasibility of daily diaries (i.e., daily symptom ratings), potential confounding factors, and alignment of COAs with proteinuria or other endpoints. Conclusions: Collectively, these insights inform the Prepare-NS initiative's ongoing development and validation efforts. Incorporating standardized COAs in NS clinical trials could expand efficacy endpoints and pave the way for patient-centered NS drug development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Glomerular Diseases
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/000550524
Primary Topic
Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Outcome Assessment Endpoints in Nephrotic Syndrome Drug Development: Research Partner Feedback on Patient-Centered Trial Design

Maja Kuharić, Eloise Salmon, Somayeh Hashemi, Noelle E. Carlozzi et al.
Glomerular Diseases
Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
article

Clinical Outcome Assessment Endpoints in Nephrotic Syndrome Drug Development: Research Partner Feedback on Patient-Centered Trial Design

Maja Kuharić, Eloise Salmon, Somayeh Hashemi, Noelle E. Carlozzi, Jin‐Shei Lai, Courtney N. Hurt, Yan Zhai, Rebecca Scherr, John Devin Peipert, Howard Trachtman, Ashley E. Rahimi, Trivellore Raghunathan, Louise Oni
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Nephrotic syndrome (NS) clinical trials often rely on biomarkers or clinical measures as primary endpoints, but these may not fully capture the treatment benefits that matter most to patients. Edema-related swelling, a central manifestation of NS, profoundly affects patients' health-related quality of life, including physical function, severe physical and mental symptoms, and ability to participate in routine activities, highlighting the need for clinical outcome assessments (COAs) that directly measure its severity and impact. The PREPARing a clinical outcomes assessment set for Nephrotic Syndrome (Prepare-NS) project, supported by the United States Food and Drug Administration's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Pilot Grant Program, aims to address this unmet need. Methods: We conducted qualitative interviews with and surveyed clinical trialists from industry, academia, and patient advocacy organizations. Each queried participants on how COAs, including patient- and observer-reported outcomes, could be used to demonstrate treatment benefit in trials. Participants were asked about preferences for timing, frequency, and format of COA assessment, as well as how COA-based endpoints could best capture swelling impacts, and how these might relate to other trial endpoints. Results: Participants expressed strong support for COA-based endpoints to complement clinical or biomarker endpoints, noting that the impact of disease as represented by proteinuria does not fully capture potential treatment benefit to patients. We identified multiple endpoints to operationalize swelling COAs in clinical trials. Additional key considerations included optimal timing of assessments, feasibility of daily diaries (i.e., daily symptom ratings), potential confounding factors, and alignment of COAs with proteinuria or other endpoints. Conclusions: Collectively, these insights inform the Prepare-NS initiative's ongoing development and validation efforts. Incorporating standardized COAs in NS clinical trials could expand efficacy endpoints and pave the way for patient-centered NS drug development.

Glomerular DiseasesVol. 6(1)
University of Liverpool (GB), University of Michigan (US), Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Michigan Medicine (US), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.