The emergence of science (reconstruction of the modes of thinking and knowledge of the founders of ancient discursivity)

The article presents a reconstruction of the formation of the worldviews of Plato and Aristotle, which contributed to the development of ancient philosophy and science. While Plato's dialogues can only be attributed to the emergence of ancient philosophy, Aristotle's works can be linked to the establishment of ancient science. It is shown that Plato's "Symposium" and "The Republic" do not constitute scientific knowledge but rather ideas and projects of desired objects. The author asserts that Aristotle completes the realization of Parmenides' program, denying the division of the world into true and false, and establishes the structure of a unified, yet differentiated, world in terms of perfection and "principles." An important innovation was the introduction of the concept of nature, which the Stagirite arrived at while reflecting on the causes of motions. Another innovation was the interpretation of the world as a unified though differentiated entity. The author analyzes both aspects using Aristotle's work "On the Heavens," in which many ideas outlined in "Physics" are developed. Engaging in polemics with A.F. Losev, the author claims that Aristotle thinks consistently and sufficiently rigorously: God as the cause of all motions and the prime mover represents a rational principle; having understood this, one can no longer use anthropomorphic characteristics of gods, which must be discarded, leaving the rational Aristotelian "God-Mind." The material from the Stagirite's "On the Heavens," Euclid's "Elements," and Archimedes' "On Floating Bodies" is examined to explore the concept and first stage of building ancient science. Although it was still imperfect in terms of describing real laws, the start of science was marked by the study of nature, the accounting of facts, the analysis of causes, correct thinking, and the construction of explanatory schemes. All this needed correction, primarily in terms of transitioning from schemes to mathematical models. A further line of development for science is outlined.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Философия и культура
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0757.2026.4.77446
Primary Topic
Digital Education and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The emergence of science (reconstruction of the modes of thinking and knowledge of the founders of ancient discursivity)

Vadim Markovich ROZIN
Философия и культура
Digital Education and Society
article

The emergence of science (reconstruction of the modes of thinking and knowledge of the founders of ancient discursivity)

Vadim Markovich ROZIN
article en

Abstract

The article presents a reconstruction of the formation of the worldviews of Plato and Aristotle, which contributed to the development of ancient philosophy and science. While Plato's dialogues can only be attributed to the emergence of ancient philosophy, Aristotle's works can be linked to the establishment of ancient science. It is shown that Plato's "Symposium" and "The Republic" do not constitute scientific knowledge but rather ideas and projects of desired objects. The author asserts that Aristotle completes the realization of Parmenides' program, denying the division of the world into true and false, and establishes the structure of a unified, yet differentiated, world in terms of perfection and "principles." An important innovation was the introduction of the concept of nature, which the Stagirite arrived at while reflecting on the causes of motions. Another innovation was the interpretation of the world as a unified though differentiated entity. The author analyzes both aspects using Aristotle's work "On the Heavens," in which many ideas outlined in "Physics" are developed. Engaging in polemics with A.F. Losev, the author claims that Aristotle thinks consistently and sufficiently rigorously: God as the cause of all motions and the prime mover represents a rational principle; having understood this, one can no longer use anthropomorphic characteristics of gods, which must be discarded, leaving the rational Aristotelian "God-Mind." The material from the Stagirite's "On the Heavens," Euclid's "Elements," and Archimedes' "On Floating Bodies" is examined to explore the concept and first stage of building ancient science. Although it was still imperfect in terms of describing real laws, the start of science was marked by the study of nature, the accounting of facts, the analysis of causes, correct thinking, and the construction of explanatory schemes. All this needed correction, primarily in terms of transitioning from schemes to mathematical models. A further line of development for science is outlined.

Философия и культура(4)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Digital Education and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.