Poor health and religiosity’s impact on voting behavior

The prevailing academic consensus is that poor health outcomes are directly linked to declining political participation; however, these consequences vary across distinct communities and populations. I argue that what is missing in the health and turnout literature is a perspective that studies how rates of poor health in U.S. counties influence turnout among the most and least religious counties. Religious adherence generates social capital, which is known to mitigate the negative consequences of the “costs” associated with voting, such as ill health. However, no study has examined these two factors together, along with their impact on turnout. My perspective, based on replication data from Cahill and Ojeda’s study of voter turnout in the 2016 election, suggests that health and religiosity should be studied together. As counties increase in religiosity, they appear to be less affected by the consequences of poor health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Political Science
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2026.1751686
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Poor health and religiosity’s impact on voting behavior

Zachary Morris
Frontiers in Political Science
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Poor health and religiosity’s impact on voting behavior

Zachary Morris
article en

Abstract

The prevailing academic consensus is that poor health outcomes are directly linked to declining political participation; however, these consequences vary across distinct communities and populations. I argue that what is missing in the health and turnout literature is a perspective that studies how rates of poor health in U.S. counties influence turnout among the most and least religious counties. Religious adherence generates social capital, which is known to mitigate the negative consequences of the “costs” associated with voting, such as ill health. However, no study has examined these two factors together, along with their impact on turnout. My perspective, based on replication data from Cahill and Ojeda’s study of voter turnout in the 2016 election, suggests that health and religiosity should be studied together. As counties increase in religiosity, they appear to be less affected by the consequences of poor health.

Frontiers in Political ScienceVol. 8
Kent State University (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.