Educating for Extinction? Ethical Simulation, Ideological Student Grooming, and the Future of Management Education

Business schools increasingly proclaim commitments to ethics, sustainability, and responsible leadership, yet these often operate as ethical simulations—performative displays that secure legitimacy while preserving the managerial and market logics driving inequality and ecological harm. This theory-led essay draws on debates in JME and related literatures to identify four interlocking mechanisms—ethical simulation, epistemic refusal, pedagogical inauthenticity, and planetary harm reproduction—through which responsibility is converted into reputational capital. We introduce ideological grooming to describe how students are trained to recognise and disavow harm simultaneously. We then advance three normative commitments for reimagining business education: epistemic completeness, pedagogical honesty, and planetary responsibility. The article outlines implications for curriculum, pedagogy, governance, and student formation, concluding by urging educators to confront the contradiction of teaching care within systems complicit in planetary destruction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organizational Behavior Teaching Review
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629261436805
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Educating for Extinction? Ethical Simulation, Ideological Student Grooming, and the Future of Management Education

David Roberts
Organizational Behavior Teaching Review
Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
article

Educating for Extinction? Ethical Simulation, Ideological Student Grooming, and the Future of Management Education

David Roberts
article en

Abstract

Business schools increasingly proclaim commitments to ethics, sustainability, and responsible leadership, yet these often operate as ethical simulations—performative displays that secure legitimacy while preserving the managerial and market logics driving inequality and ecological harm. This theory-led essay draws on debates in JME and related literatures to identify four interlocking mechanisms—ethical simulation, epistemic refusal, pedagogical inauthenticity, and planetary harm reproduction—through which responsibility is converted into reputational capital. We introduce ideological grooming to describe how students are trained to recognise and disavow harm simultaneously. We then advance three normative commitments for reimagining business education: epistemic completeness, pedagogical honesty, and planetary responsibility. The article outlines implications for curriculum, pedagogy, governance, and student formation, concluding by urging educators to confront the contradiction of teaching care within systems complicit in planetary destruction.

Organizational Behavior Teaching Review
Loughborough University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.