Multi-institutional assessment of HER2 immunohistochemistry in gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer

The reliability of the traditional HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) scoring system for classifying low-expression cases remains uncertain, creating a barrier to effectively deploying new antibody-drug conjugates. To assess inter-observer agreement, 15 pathologists independently scored HER2 IHC in 460 gastric cancer specimens. We found the highest overall percent agreement (OPA) for HER2 3+ scores (0.17). The OPA for HER2 IHC 2+ cases was 0.11. However, consensus could not be reached for specimens scored as 0 or 1+. These findings suggest that conventional HER2 IHC scoring is relatively reliable for identifying patients with high HER2 expression but reveals significant inconsistency in classifying HER2-low versus HER2-zero cases. This highlights a critical limitation of the current system for guiding modern therapies and underscores the necessity for revised, precise scoring methodologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iScience
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.115635
Primary Topic
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-institutional assessment of HER2 immunohistochemistry in gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer

Guanglin Liao, Yangqin Zheng, Shujue Zhao, Guangjun Jin et al.
iScience
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
article

Multi-institutional assessment of HER2 immunohistochemistry in gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer

Guanglin Liao, Yangqin Zheng, Shujue Zhao, Guangjun Jin, Xin Yu, Xiaoyan Zhou, J. Ying, Yanxia Ying, Menger Wang, Danni Zhu, Fei Wu, Yihua Wang, Xiaoxiao Wu, Xiangdong Cheng, Ding Wang, Feng Wang, Hui Wang, Haiqiang Wang, Yunying Liu, Jingjing Xu, Xiu Zhu, Nan Jie Li, Lan Yang, Xing Liu, Xiaoxiao Yang, Zhenyuan Liu, Qing Wei
article en

Abstract

The reliability of the traditional HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) scoring system for classifying low-expression cases remains uncertain, creating a barrier to effectively deploying new antibody-drug conjugates. To assess inter-observer agreement, 15 pathologists independently scored HER2 IHC in 460 gastric cancer specimens. We found the highest overall percent agreement (OPA) for HER2 3+ scores (0.17). The OPA for HER2 IHC 2+ cases was 0.11. However, consensus could not be reached for specimens scored as 0 or 1+. These findings suggest that conventional HER2 IHC scoring is relatively reliable for identifying patients with high HER2 expression but reveals significant inconsistency in classifying HER2-low versus HER2-zero cases. This highlights a critical limitation of the current system for guiding modern therapies and underscores the necessity for revised, precise scoring methodologies.

iScienceVol. 29(5)
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (CN), Harbin Medical University (CN), Wenzhou Medical University (CN), Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (CN), Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University (CN), Xian Yang Central Hospital (CN), Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital (CN), Wenzhou City People's Hospital (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.