Effect of Prehabilitation-Based Individualized Dietary Guidance on Nutrition and Short-Term Quality of Life in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgery: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective: To evaluate the effect of individualized dietary guidance based on the prehabilitation concept on nutritional outcomes and quality of life (QoL) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) undergoing surgery. Methods: This is a single-center randomized controlled trial (RCT). Patients who underwent radical gastrectomy following neoadjuvant therapy were included at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between January 2023 and October 2025 and randomly assigned to either the control group or the intervention group. Both groups received standard perioperative care. The control group received nutritional support, while the intervention group received individualized dietary guidance based on the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) in combination with the prehabilitation concept. Nutritional parameters [albumin (Alb), prealbumin (PA), and hemoglobin (Hb)] and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) were assessed at preoperative baseline and postoperative day 5-7 (before discharge). Quality of life (QoL) was evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) at baseline and 3 months post-intervention. Postoperative safety and short-term outcomes, including length of stay (LOS), complications (classified by Clavien-Dindo grade), mortality, and readmission within 3 months, were also recorded. Results: <0.001) than the control group. Regarding postoperative safety, no severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III) or deaths occurred in either group during hospitalization or the 3-month follow-up. The incidence of minor complications (Clavien-Dindo grade I-II) was similar between groups (3 vs 2). The intervention group had a numerically shorter postoperative LOS (7.6±1.8 vs 8.2±2.1 days), but the difference was not statistically significant. No readmissions within 3 months were recorded in either group. Conclusion: Prehabilitation-based individualized dietary guidance effectively improves short-term nutritional outcomes and enhances QoL in patients with LAGC undergoing surgery following neoadjuvant therapy. The intervention demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with no increase in complications, mortality, or readmissions. This single-center study provides preliminary evidence, and long-term outcomes (e.g. survival, readmission) were not evaluated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s587091
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Prehabilitation-Based Individualized Dietary Guidance on Nutrition and Short-Term Quality of Life in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgery: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial

Yu Hou, Qihong Gu, Jia-Ru He, Jin Zhou
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Effect of Prehabilitation-Based Individualized Dietary Guidance on Nutrition and Short-Term Quality of Life in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgery: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial

Yu Hou, Qihong Gu, Jia-Ru He, Jin Zhou
article en

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of individualized dietary guidance based on the prehabilitation concept on nutritional outcomes and quality of life (QoL) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) undergoing surgery. Methods: This is a single-center randomized controlled trial (RCT). Patients who underwent radical gastrectomy following neoadjuvant therapy were included at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between January 2023 and October 2025 and randomly assigned to either the control group or the intervention group. Both groups received standard perioperative care. The control group received nutritional support, while the intervention group received individualized dietary guidance based on the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) in combination with the prehabilitation concept. Nutritional parameters [albumin (Alb), prealbumin (PA), and hemoglobin (Hb)] and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) were assessed at preoperative baseline and postoperative day 5-7 (before discharge). Quality of life (QoL) was evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) at baseline and 3 months post-intervention. Postoperative safety and short-term outcomes, including length of stay (LOS), complications (classified by Clavien-Dindo grade), mortality, and readmission within 3 months, were also recorded. Results: <0.001) than the control group. Regarding postoperative safety, no severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III) or deaths occurred in either group during hospitalization or the 3-month follow-up. The incidence of minor complications (Clavien-Dindo grade I-II) was similar between groups (3 vs 2). The intervention group had a numerically shorter postoperative LOS (7.6±1.8 vs 8.2±2.1 days), but the difference was not statistically significant. No readmissions within 3 months were recorded in either group. Conclusion: Prehabilitation-based individualized dietary guidance effectively improves short-term nutritional outcomes and enhances QoL in patients with LAGC undergoing surgery following neoadjuvant therapy. The intervention demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with no increase in complications, mortality, or readmissions. This single-center study provides preliminary evidence, and long-term outcomes (e.g. survival, readmission) were not evaluated.

Journal of Multidisciplinary HealthcareVol. Volume 19
Soochow University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Soochow University
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.