Phonological Analysis of the Inflectional ‐ <i>s</i> in English

ABSTRACT This article investigates the phonological behavior of the English inflectional ending ‐ s , which is found in regular plural forms and in the Saxon Genitive. The analyses of the plural form are conducted assuming a single morpheme for the plural ending ‐s and are couched in the framework of Optimality Theory. The article makes two novel contributions to phonological theory. First, it argues that the family of Identity constraints should be expanded to include a constraint that requires faithfulness to a Derived Stem. Furthermore, the analysis of the Saxon Genitive ending shows that the suffix exhibits disparate effects of epenthesis and deletion, which prove insurmountable for Standard Optimality Theory and require level distinction. The second novel claim, therefore, is the treatment of the Saxon Genitive ending within Derivational Optimality Theory. I argue that the Saxon Genitive comprises, in fact, two allomorphs that occupy different levels of the evaluation. The serial‐based approach is challenged by alternative analyses of the effects related to the English inflectional ‐ s as the evaluations are recast assuming morpheme‐bound constraints and underlying allomorphy. However, the results of the fully parallel analyses are unsatisfactory and only strengthen the predictions made by Derivational Optimality Theory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studia Linguistica
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.70012
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phonological Analysis of the Inflectional ‐ s in English

Paweł Rydzewski
Studia Linguistica
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

Phonological Analysis of the Inflectional ‐ s in English

Paweł Rydzewski
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article investigates the phonological behavior of the English inflectional ending ‐ s , which is found in regular plural forms and in the Saxon Genitive. The analyses of the plural form are conducted assuming a single morpheme for the plural ending ‐s and are couched in the framework of Optimality Theory. The article makes two novel contributions to phonological theory. First, it argues that the family of Identity constraints should be expanded to include a constraint that requires faithfulness to a Derived Stem. Furthermore, the analysis of the Saxon Genitive ending shows that the suffix exhibits disparate effects of epenthesis and deletion, which prove insurmountable for Standard Optimality Theory and require level distinction. The second novel claim, therefore, is the treatment of the Saxon Genitive ending within Derivational Optimality Theory. I argue that the Saxon Genitive comprises, in fact, two allomorphs that occupy different levels of the evaluation. The serial‐based approach is challenged by alternative analyses of the effects related to the English inflectional ‐ s as the evaluations are recast assuming morpheme‐bound constraints and underlying allomorphy. However, the results of the fully parallel analyses are unsatisfactory and only strengthen the predictions made by Derivational Optimality Theory.

Studia LinguisticaVol. 80(1)
Institute of Political Studies (PL), University of Warsaw (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.