Caffeine and Cardiovascular Outcomes: Current Evidence and Clinical Perspectives

Caffeine is among the most widely consumed bioactive compounds worldwide and remains a target of cardiovascular counseling despite heterogeneous evidence across mechanistic, interventional, and epidemiologic studies. At dietary doses, caffeine acts as a competitive antagonist of adenosine receptors, influencing autonomic tone, vascular resistance, and myocardial electrophysiology. Acute exposure can produce increases in blood pressure, alterations in sympathetic activity, and changes in ventricular ectopy, whereas habitual coffee consumption is associated in cohort studies with neutral or modestly favorable cardiovascular outcomes, including lower risks of cardiovascular mortality, heart failure, and stroke at moderate intake levels. Evidence from randomized and observational studies does not support a consistent proarrhythmic effect of habitual coffee consumption, and recent clinical trials challenge recommendations for caffeine restriction in conditions such as atrial fibrillation. Importantly, caffeine exposure is heterogeneous: energy drinks and concentrated caffeine products demonstrate more consistent electrophysiologic and hemodynamic effects, including QTc prolongation and sustained blood pressure elevation, suggesting a distinct risk profile compared with coffee or tea. Genetic variability in caffeine metabolism and differences in exposure patterns further modify individual responses. Overall, current evidence supports a dose-, source-, and patient-specific framework for interpreting caffeine exposure in cardiovascular medicine rather than universal restriction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cardiology in Review
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/crd.0000000000001252
Primary Topic
Coffee research and impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Caffeine and Cardiovascular Outcomes: Current Evidence and Clinical Perspectives

William H. Frishman, Wilbert S. Aronow, Negarsadat Neshat
Cardiology in Review
Coffee research and impacts
article

Caffeine and Cardiovascular Outcomes: Current Evidence and Clinical Perspectives

William H. Frishman, Wilbert S. Aronow, Negarsadat Neshat
article en

Abstract

Caffeine is among the most widely consumed bioactive compounds worldwide and remains a target of cardiovascular counseling despite heterogeneous evidence across mechanistic, interventional, and epidemiologic studies. At dietary doses, caffeine acts as a competitive antagonist of adenosine receptors, influencing autonomic tone, vascular resistance, and myocardial electrophysiology. Acute exposure can produce increases in blood pressure, alterations in sympathetic activity, and changes in ventricular ectopy, whereas habitual coffee consumption is associated in cohort studies with neutral or modestly favorable cardiovascular outcomes, including lower risks of cardiovascular mortality, heart failure, and stroke at moderate intake levels. Evidence from randomized and observational studies does not support a consistent proarrhythmic effect of habitual coffee consumption, and recent clinical trials challenge recommendations for caffeine restriction in conditions such as atrial fibrillation. Importantly, caffeine exposure is heterogeneous: energy drinks and concentrated caffeine products demonstrate more consistent electrophysiologic and hemodynamic effects, including QTc prolongation and sustained blood pressure elevation, suggesting a distinct risk profile compared with coffee or tea. Genetic variability in caffeine metabolism and differences in exposure patterns further modify individual responses. Overall, current evidence supports a dose-, source-, and patient-specific framework for interpreting caffeine exposure in cardiovascular medicine rather than universal restriction.

Cardiology in Review
Westchester Medical Center (US), New York Medical College (US), WellStar Kennestone Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Coffee research and impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.