How we constructed the future in the past: the use of temporal complexity and imagined futures in interviewees’ justifications for their actions

Determining why people did this or that in the past – their justifications for their actions – is a common goal of qualitative interviews. Yet interview methods have been criticised for taking participants’ accounts at face value, and for obscuring the collective nature of decision-making by focusing on the individual. This article argues that both limitations of account-seeking interviews stem, in part, from a lack of attention to the complex temporal terrain of justifications. Justifications do not only recount the past: interviewees point in many temporal directions, including giving accounts of imagined futures that they sought to bring into reality in the past. The article outlines and demonstrates an approach to transcript analysis informed by the sociology of conventions that is attentive to this temporal complexity, arguing that this approach deals with some of the criticisms levelled at interviews as a means of accessing why things have been done.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Research Methodology
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2026.2651300
Primary Topic
Data Analysis and Archiving
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How we constructed the future in the past: the use of temporal complexity and imagined futures in interviewees’ justifications for their actions

Kathryn Telling
International Journal of Social Research Methodology
Data Analysis and Archiving
article

How we constructed the future in the past: the use of temporal complexity and imagined futures in interviewees’ justifications for their actions

Kathryn Telling
article en

Abstract

Determining why people did this or that in the past – their justifications for their actions – is a common goal of qualitative interviews. Yet interview methods have been criticised for taking participants’ accounts at face value, and for obscuring the collective nature of decision-making by focusing on the individual. This article argues that both limitations of account-seeking interviews stem, in part, from a lack of attention to the complex temporal terrain of justifications. Justifications do not only recount the past: interviewees point in many temporal directions, including giving accounts of imagined futures that they sought to bring into reality in the past. The article outlines and demonstrates an approach to transcript analysis informed by the sociology of conventions that is attentive to this temporal complexity, arguing that this approach deals with some of the criticisms levelled at interviews as a means of accessing why things have been done.

International Journal of Social Research Methodology
University of Manchester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Data Analysis and Archiving
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.