Safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine in combination with ropivacaine for lumbar paravertebral block in posterior lumbar surgery: a randomized controlled trial

To evaluate the analgesic synergistic effect of ropivacaine lumbar paravertebral block (LPB) on patients undergoing lumbar surgery under general anesthesia, and to investigate whether dexmedetomidine as a local anesthetic adjuvant can further enhance analgesic efficacy, suppress perioperative stress-induced inflammatory responses, and improve postoperative recovery quality. A total of 120 patients scheduled for elective posterior lumbar surgery were enrolled and randomly assigned to three groups (n = 40 each) using a random number table. All patients underwent general anesthesia. Prior to anesthesia induction, the L group and DL group received ultrasound-guided bilateral lumbar paracentesis (LPB). The L group received 15 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine per side, while the DL group received 15 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine containing 0.5 µg/kg dexmedetomidine per side. The C group did not receive nerve block. The primary outcome measure was intraoperative sufentanil dosage, while secondary outcomes included postoperative numeric rating scale (NRS) scores for rest and activity, 15-item quality of recovery (QoR-15) scores, serum levels of inflammatory and stress markers, and the incidence of perioperative adverse events. Overall significant differences in intraoperative propofol and sufentanil doses were observed among the three groups (all adjusted P < 0.05). Post-hoc pairwise comparisons showed that Group L and Group DL had significantly lower intraoperative propofol and sufentanil doses compared with Group C (all Bonferroni-adjusted P < 0.0167). Furthermore, the doses of both agents were significantly lower in Group DL than in Group L (all Bonferroni-adjusted P < 0.0167). Compared with Group C, Groups L and DL demonstrated significantly reduced intraoperative sufentanil dosage, markedly lower NRS scores at all postoperative time points, significantly higher QoR-15 scale scores, and significantly lower serum levels of inflammatory and stress markers (all P < 0.05 after adjustment). All these outcomes in Group DL showed significant improvement compared to Group L (all P < 0.05 after adjustment). No statistically significant differences were observed in perioperative adverse event rates among the three groups (P > 0.05). Lopivacaine LPB effectively optimizes perioperative management for patients undergoing lumbar surgery. The addition of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant further enhances analgesic efficacy, prolongs analgesia duration, suppresses perioperative stress-induced inflammatory responses, significantly improves early postoperative recovery quality, and demonstrates favorable short-term safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Anesthesiology
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-026-03782-3
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine in combination with ropivacaine for lumbar paravertebral block in posterior lumbar surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Hong Luo, Yuwei Zhang, Hailong Wu, Lifen Zheng et al.
BMC Anesthesiology
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine in combination with ropivacaine for lumbar paravertebral block in posterior lumbar surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Hong Luo, Yuwei Zhang, Hailong Wu, Lifen Zheng, Wenli Shen, Xue Zhang, Heng Yang, Dengpan Yao
article en

Abstract

To evaluate the analgesic synergistic effect of ropivacaine lumbar paravertebral block (LPB) on patients undergoing lumbar surgery under general anesthesia, and to investigate whether dexmedetomidine as a local anesthetic adjuvant can further enhance analgesic efficacy, suppress perioperative stress-induced inflammatory responses, and improve postoperative recovery quality. A total of 120 patients scheduled for elective posterior lumbar surgery were enrolled and randomly assigned to three groups (n = 40 each) using a random number table. All patients underwent general anesthesia. Prior to anesthesia induction, the L group and DL group received ultrasound-guided bilateral lumbar paracentesis (LPB). The L group received 15 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine per side, while the DL group received 15 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine containing 0.5 µg/kg dexmedetomidine per side. The C group did not receive nerve block. The primary outcome measure was intraoperative sufentanil dosage, while secondary outcomes included postoperative numeric rating scale (NRS) scores for rest and activity, 15-item quality of recovery (QoR-15) scores, serum levels of inflammatory and stress markers, and the incidence of perioperative adverse events. Overall significant differences in intraoperative propofol and sufentanil doses were observed among the three groups (all adjusted P < 0.05). Post-hoc pairwise comparisons showed that Group L and Group DL had significantly lower intraoperative propofol and sufentanil doses compared with Group C (all Bonferroni-adjusted P < 0.0167). Furthermore, the doses of both agents were significantly lower in Group DL than in Group L (all Bonferroni-adjusted P < 0.0167). Compared with Group C, Groups L and DL demonstrated significantly reduced intraoperative sufentanil dosage, markedly lower NRS scores at all postoperative time points, significantly higher QoR-15 scale scores, and significantly lower serum levels of inflammatory and stress markers (all P < 0.05 after adjustment). All these outcomes in Group DL showed significant improvement compared to Group L (all P < 0.05 after adjustment). No statistically significant differences were observed in perioperative adverse event rates among the three groups (P > 0.05). Lopivacaine LPB effectively optimizes perioperative management for patients undergoing lumbar surgery. The addition of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant further enhances analgesic efficacy, prolongs analgesia duration, suppresses perioperative stress-induced inflammatory responses, significantly improves early postoperative recovery quality, and demonstrates favorable short-term safety.

BMC Anesthesiology
Anhui Medical University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (CN), Third People's Hospital of Hefei (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.