Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Landfill Methane: Boundary Effects and Method Variability

This article presents a systematic literature review on methane (CH4) emissions from municipal solid waste (MSW) disposal sites and their implications for footprint outcomes. This review followed a PRISMA 2020 screening logic using Scopus and ScienceDirect (2019–2024); English and Spanish; subject areas: engineering and environmental, earth sciences), yielding a final sample of 30 studies for qualitative synthesis. This review focuses on how landfill CH4 is quantified and how system boundaries and functional units shape reported CO2 results. Evidence indicates that reported CH4 estimates are sensitive to methodological choices and key assumptions and site-context drivers (degradable organic carbon (DOC)/model first-order decay (FOD) and constant k, the methane correction factor (MCF), gas collection, oxidation, waste composition, landfill age/type, and climate), limiting direct comparability between studies. Mitigation and waste-to-energy pathways (capture/utilization, anaerobic digestion, and incineration) are summarized in terms of the reported climate benefits. Finally, reporting gaps are identified, and the minimum information set is outlined to improve the reproducibility of landfill-related carbon footprint estimates for planning and future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clean Technologies
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol8020052
Primary Topic
Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Landfill Methane: Boundary Effects and Method Variability

Diana Pinto, Heidis Cano, Héctor Rivera
Clean Technologies
Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
article

Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Landfill Methane: Boundary Effects and Method Variability

Diana Pinto, Heidis Cano, Héctor Rivera
article en

Abstract

This article presents a systematic literature review on methane (CH4) emissions from municipal solid waste (MSW) disposal sites and their implications for footprint outcomes. This review followed a PRISMA 2020 screening logic using Scopus and ScienceDirect (2019–2024); English and Spanish; subject areas: engineering and environmental, earth sciences), yielding a final sample of 30 studies for qualitative synthesis. This review focuses on how landfill CH4 is quantified and how system boundaries and functional units shape reported CO2 results. Evidence indicates that reported CH4 estimates are sensitive to methodological choices and key assumptions and site-context drivers (degradable organic carbon (DOC)/model first-order decay (FOD) and constant k, the methane correction factor (MCF), gas collection, oxidation, waste composition, landfill age/type, and climate), limiting direct comparability between studies. Mitigation and waste-to-energy pathways (capture/utilization, anaerobic digestion, and incineration) are summarized in terms of the reported climate benefits. Finally, reporting gaps are identified, and the minimum information set is outlined to improve the reproducibility of landfill-related carbon footprint estimates for planning and future research.

Clean TechnologiesVol. 8(2)
University of the Coast (CO)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.