Coaches’ definitions of success in sport: A rapid review

This rapid review examined how sport coaches conceptualise success, a term widely invoked yet rarely defined within coaching practice and policy. The review synthesised findings from 17 articles published between 2000 and 2024 that explicitly included coaches’ voices. Using a deductive coding framework encompassing performance, sport growth, personal growth, emotional growth, and coach-oriented outcomes, the analysis revealed success as being a multivalent, contextually-driven, dynamic and complex concept. Personal development of athletes and winning were frequently cited as ways in which coaches defined success, but no article cited winning as the only definition of success. The breadth of ways in which coaches understood what defined success presents the potential for tension within sporting contexts, especially if coaches’ definitions do not align with those of other stakeholders. This underscores the importance of establishing shared definitions of success within sporting environments to reduce tensions among stakeholders and promote aligned, holistic approaches to sport experiences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541261432364
Primary Topic
Sport Psychology and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coaches’ definitions of success in sport: A rapid review

Shane Pill, Pip Henderson, Will Vickery
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Sport Psychology and Performance
article

Coaches’ definitions of success in sport: A rapid review

Shane Pill, Pip Henderson, Will Vickery
article en

Abstract

This rapid review examined how sport coaches conceptualise success, a term widely invoked yet rarely defined within coaching practice and policy. The review synthesised findings from 17 articles published between 2000 and 2024 that explicitly included coaches’ voices. Using a deductive coding framework encompassing performance, sport growth, personal growth, emotional growth, and coach-oriented outcomes, the analysis revealed success as being a multivalent, contextually-driven, dynamic and complex concept. Personal development of athletes and winning were frequently cited as ways in which coaches defined success, but no article cited winning as the only definition of success. The breadth of ways in which coaches understood what defined success presents the potential for tension within sporting contexts, especially if coaches’ definitions do not align with those of other stakeholders. This underscores the importance of establishing shared definitions of success within sporting environments to reduce tensions among stakeholders and promote aligned, holistic approaches to sport experiences.

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Flinders University (AU), Australian Sports Commission (AU)
Australian Sports Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Sport Psychology and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.