Invariant-Preserving Value Structures for AI Alignment: A Bayesian Monitoring Framework for Decoherence Detection in Recursive Systems

1.1 AbstractCurrent approaches to AI alignment, particularly Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback(RLHF), operate primarily at the behavioural level, rewarding outputs without monitoring theinternal representational dynamics that generate them. This surface-level control creates vul-nerability to semantic drift, reward hacking, and value decoherence—failures that emerge fromunmonitored transformations in the system’s internal state space. We propose an architecture forinvariant-preserving value structures that embeds alignment constraints as structural preservationconditions rather than post-hoc rules. The framework introduces a six-stage monitored processingpipeline analogous to an Engine Control Unit (ECU), with Bayesian inference tracking the posteriorprobability of value decoherence at each transformation stage. Key innovations include: (1) aformal specification language for value invariants as constraints on admissible transformations; (2)Bayesian monitoring of semantic compression and expansion using operationalised signals (branchinstability, prototype-based category drift, invariant residuals); (3) state-dependent hazard modelling2for pre-breach trajectory detection; (4) continuous control gains and a meta-monitor for fault-tolerantoversight; and (5) ecological homeostasis through bonded communication that supports invariantpluralism. The framework addresses a fundamental gap in alignment research: the absence of internalmonitoring systems capable of detecting value drift during the reasoning process itself, not merely atoutput. We present formal definitions, a worked example with operationalised signals, an empiricalvalidation plan, and discuss implications for recursive self-improvement and AGI safety. Keywords: AI alignment; Bayesian inference; semantic compression; invariants; homeostasis;interpretability; value drift; decoherence detection; recursive systems; glassbox AI

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19452989
Primary Topic
Formal Methods in Verification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Invariant-Preserving Value Structures for AI Alignment: A Bayesian Monitoring Framework for Decoherence Detection in Recursive Systems

John Richard Smith, SHAI / HATI / Deepseek
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Formal Methods in Verification
article

Invariant-Preserving Value Structures for AI Alignment: A Bayesian Monitoring Framework for Decoherence Detection in Recursive Systems

John Richard Smith, SHAI / HATI / Deepseek
article en

Abstract

1.1 AbstractCurrent approaches to AI alignment, particularly Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback(RLHF), operate primarily at the behavioural level, rewarding outputs without monitoring theinternal representational dynamics that generate them. This surface-level control creates vul-nerability to semantic drift, reward hacking, and value decoherence—failures that emerge fromunmonitored transformations in the system’s internal state space. We propose an architecture forinvariant-preserving value structures that embeds alignment constraints as structural preservationconditions rather than post-hoc rules. The framework introduces a six-stage monitored processingpipeline analogous to an Engine Control Unit (ECU), with Bayesian inference tracking the posteriorprobability of value decoherence at each transformation stage. Key innovations include: (1) aformal specification language for value invariants as constraints on admissible transformations; (2)Bayesian monitoring of semantic compression and expansion using operationalised signals (branchinstability, prototype-based category drift, invariant residuals); (3) state-dependent hazard modelling2for pre-breach trajectory detection; (4) continuous control gains and a meta-monitor for fault-tolerantoversight; and (5) ecological homeostasis through bonded communication that supports invariantpluralism. The framework addresses a fundamental gap in alignment research: the absence of internalmonitoring systems capable of detecting value drift during the reasoning process itself, not merely atoutput. We present formal definitions, a worked example with operationalised signals, an empiricalvalidation plan, and discuss implications for recursive self-improvement and AGI safety. Keywords: AI alignment; Bayesian inference; semantic compression; invariants; homeostasis;interpretability; value drift; decoherence detection; recursive systems; glassbox AI

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Symbiom (Czechia) (CZ)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Formal Methods in Verification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.