Artificial Intelligence in Surgical Care: A Point-Counterpoint Analysis
Artificial intelligence (AI) integration in surgical care represents a paradigm shift with significant potential benefits and risks. This point-counterpoint debate examined the proposition that AI improves surgical patient care. A structured debate format featuring Dr Divya Kewalramani (pro-AI) and Dr Michael Aboutanos (con-AI) explored the current state, opportunities, and challenges of AI implementation in surgical practice. The pro-AI argument emphasized addressing surgical care gaps through predictive analytics, supply chain optimization, and enhanced postoperative monitoring. The con-AI position highlighted concerns about data biases, validation deficits, hallucinations, and implementation risks. While AI demonstrates potential to improve surgical care, substantial challenges remain regarding validation, inclusivity, and oversight. Responsible adoption requires robust evaluation frameworks, diverse datasets, and continuous postimplementation monitoring.
Authors
- Megan T. Quintana (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1298-816X)
- Mayur Narayan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7232-7446)
- Saman Qadri
- Divya Kewalramani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9125-0909)
- Michel B. Aboutanos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2090-1992)
Institutions
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- George Washington University (US)
- Johnson University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open
- Published
- 2026-04-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2025-002093
- Primary Topic
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00