Do Investors Respond Differently to Non-GAAP Earnings After Material GAAP Restatements?

SYNOPSIS I investigate whether investors change their responsiveness to non-GAAP earnings following the revelation of past GAAP reporting failures. Using an event-study design, I find that the earnings response coefficient (ERC) for non-GAAP earnings declines by 40.4 percent after the announcement of material GAAP restatements, suggesting that investors view non-GAAP earnings as less informative once the reliability of the underlying GAAP framework is called into question. The decline in non-GAAP ERCs is not explained by changes in delayed investor reactions or non-GAAP-related SEC comment letters. Taken together, the results are consistent with a credibility spillover across mandatory and voluntary reporting frameworks, whereby investors use GAAP signals to infer the credibility of non-GAAP earnings. My findings underscore the interconnectedness of GAAP and non-GAAP reporting and contribute to ongoing debates about the credibility of non-GAAP measures. Data Availability: The data are available from the sources indicated in the text. JEL Classifications: G14; D82; M41.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accounting Horizons
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/horizons-2025-176
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Investors Respond Differently to Non-GAAP Earnings After Material GAAP Restatements?

Christian Sofilkanitsch
Accounting Horizons
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Do Investors Respond Differently to Non-GAAP Earnings After Material GAAP Restatements?

Christian Sofilkanitsch
article en

Abstract

SYNOPSIS I investigate whether investors change their responsiveness to non-GAAP earnings following the revelation of past GAAP reporting failures. Using an event-study design, I find that the earnings response coefficient (ERC) for non-GAAP earnings declines by 40.4 percent after the announcement of material GAAP restatements, suggesting that investors view non-GAAP earnings as less informative once the reliability of the underlying GAAP framework is called into question. The decline in non-GAAP ERCs is not explained by changes in delayed investor reactions or non-GAAP-related SEC comment letters. Taken together, the results are consistent with a credibility spillover across mandatory and voluntary reporting frameworks, whereby investors use GAAP signals to infer the credibility of non-GAAP earnings. My findings underscore the interconnectedness of GAAP and non-GAAP reporting and contribute to ongoing debates about the credibility of non-GAAP measures. Data Availability: The data are available from the sources indicated in the text. JEL Classifications: G14; D82; M41.

Accounting Horizons
Nazarbayev University (KZ)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Nazarbayev University
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.