Post-progression treatment patterns in systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease-associated interstitial lung disease: insights from a US retrospective, observational study

OBJECTIVE: Patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) are at high risk of developing interstitial lung disease (ILD). We sought to gain insight into the pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments being used by patients with SARD-associated ILD (SARD-ILD) following ILD progression. DESIGN: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study. SETTING: Optum Clinformatics Data Mart administrative medical and pharmacy claims database in the USA. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with SARD-ILD who had an incident ILD diagnosis and progression between January 2018 and March 2023. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Treatment patterns and healthcare services utiliation were descriptively summarised for baseline and follow-up periods. RESULTS: We identified 6431 patients with SARD-ILD and evidence of ILD progression (mean age, 71.2 years; 75.3% female; 68.9% white). The mean (SD) time between the initial SARD-ILD diagnosis and the onset of ILD progression (index date) was 104 (201) days. On average, patients were followed for 936 (467) days.Oral corticosteroids were the most common treatment post-progression (69.5%), followed by non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (non-biologic DMARDs) (41.6%), biologic DMARDs (15.5%) and immunomodulators (15.4%). Antifibrotics were received by 3.5% of patients. Supplemental oxygen was the most frequent non-pharmacological treatment (48.9%). For the baseline period, 53.0% and 42.1% of patients used inpatient and emergency department services, respectively. During the follow-up, 69.7% and 62.8%, respectively, used these services. CONCLUSION: The high use of corticosteroids and limited use of DMARDs and antifibrotics post-progression in this descriptive study implies a significant gap between current practice and optimal management of patients with SARD-ILD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Open
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114632
Primary Topic
Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Post-progression treatment patterns in systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease-associated interstitial lung disease: insights from a US retrospective, observational study

A. Chauffe, Katy Sadowski, Tejaswini Kulkarni, Joseph Yang et al.
BMJ Open
Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
article

Post-progression treatment patterns in systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease-associated interstitial lung disease: insights from a US retrospective, observational study

A. Chauffe, Katy Sadowski, Tejaswini Kulkarni, Joseph Yang, Akshay Kharat
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) are at high risk of developing interstitial lung disease (ILD). We sought to gain insight into the pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments being used by patients with SARD-associated ILD (SARD-ILD) following ILD progression. DESIGN: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study. SETTING: Optum Clinformatics Data Mart administrative medical and pharmacy claims database in the USA. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with SARD-ILD who had an incident ILD diagnosis and progression between January 2018 and March 2023. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Treatment patterns and healthcare services utiliation were descriptively summarised for baseline and follow-up periods. RESULTS: We identified 6431 patients with SARD-ILD and evidence of ILD progression (mean age, 71.2 years; 75.3% female; 68.9% white). The mean (SD) time between the initial SARD-ILD diagnosis and the onset of ILD progression (index date) was 104 (201) days. On average, patients were followed for 936 (467) days.Oral corticosteroids were the most common treatment post-progression (69.5%), followed by non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (non-biologic DMARDs) (41.6%), biologic DMARDs (15.5%) and immunomodulators (15.4%). Antifibrotics were received by 3.5% of patients. Supplemental oxygen was the most frequent non-pharmacological treatment (48.9%). For the baseline period, 53.0% and 42.1% of patients used inpatient and emergency department services, respectively. During the follow-up, 69.7% and 62.8%, respectively, used these services. CONCLUSION: The high use of corticosteroids and limited use of DMARDs and antifibrotics post-progression in this descriptive study implies a significant gap between current practice and optimal management of patients with SARD-ILD.

BMJ OpenVol. 16(4)
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Boehringer Ingelheim (United States) (US)
Boehringer Ingelheim, American Thoracic Society
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.