How the brain predicts timing: distinct network hubs for predicting and evaluating auditory sensory events

Introduction: Temporal prediction enhances perceptual processing by aligning neural excitability with expected sensory events. While local oscillatory mechanisms are known to support timing, less is understood about how large-scale functional brain networks dynamically coordinate predictive processes. In particular, it remains unclear how functional connectivity (FC)-the integration of information into network hubs-differs during expectation formation (prediction) versus post-target outcome evaluation, and how this varies across levels of predictability. Methods: To investigate this, we recorded electroencephalographic data (EEG) while participants performed a cued auditory target-detection task with varying temporal predictability (80% and 50%). FC was analyzed using a data-driven approach based on Normalized Directed Transfer Entropy (NDTE) applied to EEG difference waveforms between high- and low-predictability conditions, separately for the post-cue and post-target periods to distinguish prediction and evaluation phases. Results: Behaviorally, higher temporal predictability facilitated faster reaction times. Event-related potential (ERP) results revealed that implicit temporal predictability primarily modulated later evaluative processes (P3b, frontal negativity), rather than early sensory components, consistent with context updating under uncertainty. FC analyses revealed that the fronto-temporo-parietal network engaged in the prediction phase evolves into a more focal auditory-frontal circuit during the evaluation of the prediction outcomes. Discussion: Our findings highlight that temporal prediction and evaluation are supported by the dynamic interactions among multiple large-scale networks rather than by any single region or pathway, supporting both frontal-dominant and distributed integration models of predictive processing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2026.1739294
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How the brain predicts timing: distinct network hubs for predicting and evaluating auditory sensory events

Robert Baumgartner, Orsolya Szalárdy, Péter Nagy, Petra Kovács et al.
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
article

How the brain predicts timing: distinct network hubs for predicting and evaluating auditory sensory events

Robert Baumgartner, Orsolya Szalárdy, Péter Nagy, Petra Kovács, Brigitta Tóth, István Winkler, Karolina Ignatiadis, Ádám Boncz
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Temporal prediction enhances perceptual processing by aligning neural excitability with expected sensory events. While local oscillatory mechanisms are known to support timing, less is understood about how large-scale functional brain networks dynamically coordinate predictive processes. In particular, it remains unclear how functional connectivity (FC)-the integration of information into network hubs-differs during expectation formation (prediction) versus post-target outcome evaluation, and how this varies across levels of predictability. Methods: To investigate this, we recorded electroencephalographic data (EEG) while participants performed a cued auditory target-detection task with varying temporal predictability (80% and 50%). FC was analyzed using a data-driven approach based on Normalized Directed Transfer Entropy (NDTE) applied to EEG difference waveforms between high- and low-predictability conditions, separately for the post-cue and post-target periods to distinguish prediction and evaluation phases. Results: Behaviorally, higher temporal predictability facilitated faster reaction times. Event-related potential (ERP) results revealed that implicit temporal predictability primarily modulated later evaluative processes (P3b, frontal negativity), rather than early sensory components, consistent with context updating under uncertainty. FC analyses revealed that the fronto-temporo-parietal network engaged in the prediction phase evolves into a more focal auditory-frontal circuit during the evaluation of the prediction outcomes. Discussion: Our findings highlight that temporal prediction and evaluation are supported by the dynamic interactions among multiple large-scale networks rather than by any single region or pathway, supporting both frontal-dominant and distributed integration models of predictive processing.

Frontiers in NeuroscienceVol. 20
Semmelweis University (HU), Austrian Academy of Sciences (AT), Acoustics Research Institute (AT), Budapest University of Technology and Economics (HU), Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod (FR), Institute of Behavioral Sciences (JP), Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.