Market Operation Strategy for Wind–Hydro-Storage in Spot and Ramping Service Markets Under the Ramping Cost Responsibility Allocation Mechanism

The ramping requirement in new power systems primarily stems from net load variations and forecast errors of renewable energy and load. Designing an equitable cost allocation mechanism for ramping services based on these factors facilitates incentives for generation and load to actively reduce ramping demands, thereby alleviating system ramping pressure. Accordingly, this paper proposes a fair ramping cost allocation mechanism based on the ramping responsibility coefficients of market participants. Under this mechanism, a market-oriented operation model for wind–hydro-storage joint operation is established to verify its effectiveness in market applications. First, a ramping cost allocation mechanism is constructed based on ramping responsibility coefficients. According to the responsibility coefficients of market participants for deterministic and uncertain ramping requirements, ramping costs are allocated to the corresponding contributors in proportion to the ramping demands caused by net load variations, load forecast deviations, and renewable energy forecast deviations. Specifically, for costs arising from renewable energy forecast errors, an allocation mechanism is designed based on the difference between the declared error range and the actual error. Second, within this allocation framework, hydropower and storage (including cascade hydropower and hybrid pumped storage) are utilized as flexible resources to mitigate wind power uncertainty and reduce its ramping costs. A two-stage day-ahead and real-time bi-level game model for wind–hydro-storage cooperative decision-making is developed. The upper level optimizes bilateral trading and market bidding strategies for wind–hydro-storage, while the lower level simulates the market clearing process. Through Stackelberg game modeling, joint optimal operation of wind–hydro-storage is achieved, ensuring mutual benefits. Finally, simulation results validate that the proposed ramping cost allocation mechanism can guide renewable energy to improve output controllability through economic signals. Furthermore, the bilateral trading and coordinated market participation of wind–hydro-storage realize win–win outcomes, reduce the ramping cost allocation for wind power by 23.10%, effectively narrow peak-valley price differences, and enhance market operational efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19071799
Primary Topic
Electric Power System Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Market Operation Strategy for Wind–Hydro-Storage in Spot and Ramping Service Markets Under the Ramping Cost Responsibility Allocation Mechanism

Xiaofeng Li, Yan Zhang, Guodong Song
Energies
Electric Power System Optimization
article

Market Operation Strategy for Wind–Hydro-Storage in Spot and Ramping Service Markets Under the Ramping Cost Responsibility Allocation Mechanism

Xiaofeng Li, Yan Zhang, Guodong Song
article en

Abstract

The ramping requirement in new power systems primarily stems from net load variations and forecast errors of renewable energy and load. Designing an equitable cost allocation mechanism for ramping services based on these factors facilitates incentives for generation and load to actively reduce ramping demands, thereby alleviating system ramping pressure. Accordingly, this paper proposes a fair ramping cost allocation mechanism based on the ramping responsibility coefficients of market participants. Under this mechanism, a market-oriented operation model for wind–hydro-storage joint operation is established to verify its effectiveness in market applications. First, a ramping cost allocation mechanism is constructed based on ramping responsibility coefficients. According to the responsibility coefficients of market participants for deterministic and uncertain ramping requirements, ramping costs are allocated to the corresponding contributors in proportion to the ramping demands caused by net load variations, load forecast deviations, and renewable energy forecast deviations. Specifically, for costs arising from renewable energy forecast errors, an allocation mechanism is designed based on the difference between the declared error range and the actual error. Second, within this allocation framework, hydropower and storage (including cascade hydropower and hybrid pumped storage) are utilized as flexible resources to mitigate wind power uncertainty and reduce its ramping costs. A two-stage day-ahead and real-time bi-level game model for wind–hydro-storage cooperative decision-making is developed. The upper level optimizes bilateral trading and market bidding strategies for wind–hydro-storage, while the lower level simulates the market clearing process. Through Stackelberg game modeling, joint optimal operation of wind–hydro-storage is achieved, ensuring mutual benefits. Finally, simulation results validate that the proposed ramping cost allocation mechanism can guide renewable energy to improve output controllability through economic signals. Furthermore, the bilateral trading and coordinated market participation of wind–hydro-storage realize win–win outcomes, reduce the ramping cost allocation for wind power by 23.10%, effectively narrow peak-valley price differences, and enhance market operational efficiency.

EnergiesVol. 19(7)
China Three Gorges University (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Electric Power System Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.