Populist Governance in Sweden and Its Impact on State‐Civil Society Relations From CSOs' Perspective

ABSTRACT This article examines the impact of populist governance on state–civil society relations in Sweden, a country traditionally marked by collaborative relations and democratic stability. Focusing on reforms in adult education and international aid under a government supported by a right‐wing populist party, the study explores how these changes are perceived by civil society organizations (CSOs). Drawing on qualitative interviews with CSO representatives, the analysis applies the concept of populist governance—characterized by polarizing communication, state capture, and measures against political opposition. Findings reveal increased control, reduced autonomy, and declining trust in public institutions, with CSOs perceiving politicized funding processes and diminished opportunities for advocacy. While some reforms reflect broader governance trends, the study identifies a shift in the “rules of the game,” suggesting a democratic backsliding. The article contributes to understanding how populist governance manifests in liberal democracies and reshapes the role of civil society in public policy.