Who engages with fact-checking? Identifying factors influencing exposure to and reading of multi-platform verification

Fact-checkers have the potential to guide citizens toward accurate information, but it is unclear to what extent fact-checkers are reaching this potential among the general public as research on the factors that predict exposure to and deeper reading of fact-checks remains limited. Building on the Opportunity-Motivation-Ability Framework, this survey study (N = 2520) aims to address this research gap. A representative sample of the Flemish population was surveyed on their general fact-check exposure on different platforms and reading of fact-checks. By outlining the different media platforms, this study gives an in-depth overview of the predictive factors of both exposure and deeper reading. The results indicate that motivation (political interest and media skepticism) is a significant predictor of both exposure and reading. Opportunity (general news consumption) is less influential. Ability (education level and news media literacy) exerts varying influences on specific platforms. Overall, the findings suggest that mostly those with more opportunities, motivation and abilities are reached by fact-checks, and less so those who have fewer of these attributes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Communication & Society
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2026.2652510
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who engages with fact-checking? Identifying factors influencing exposure to and reading of multi-platform verification

Michaël Opgenhaffen, Cato Waeterloos, Peter Van Aelst
Information Communication & Society
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Who engages with fact-checking? Identifying factors influencing exposure to and reading of multi-platform verification

Michaël Opgenhaffen, Cato Waeterloos, Peter Van Aelst
article en

Abstract

Fact-checkers have the potential to guide citizens toward accurate information, but it is unclear to what extent fact-checkers are reaching this potential among the general public as research on the factors that predict exposure to and deeper reading of fact-checks remains limited. Building on the Opportunity-Motivation-Ability Framework, this survey study (N = 2520) aims to address this research gap. A representative sample of the Flemish population was surveyed on their general fact-check exposure on different platforms and reading of fact-checks. By outlining the different media platforms, this study gives an in-depth overview of the predictive factors of both exposure and deeper reading. The results indicate that motivation (political interest and media skepticism) is a significant predictor of both exposure and reading. Opportunity (general news consumption) is less influential. Ability (education level and news media literacy) exerts varying influences on specific platforms. Overall, the findings suggest that mostly those with more opportunities, motivation and abilities are reached by fact-checks, and less so those who have fewer of these attributes.

Information Communication & Society
University of Antwerp (BE), Hasselt University (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
KU Leuven
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.