A peer-delivered mobile model to enhance access to hepatitis C point-of-care testing and treatment: The Peers on Wheels study

BACKGROUND: Peer-based models supporting testing and treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have been explored, but peer-led testing is less common. We examined HCV testing and treatment following a mobile peer-led intervention integrating incentives, peer-delivered point-of-care HCV RNA testing, and linkage to care. METHODS: Peers On Wheels is an observational study of peer-led mobile outreach integrating incentives, peer-delivered point-of-care HCV antibody and RNA testing, same-day receipt of test results, and peer-assisted linkage to care and treatment to people at HCV risk. Participants were recruited between July 2022 and May 2023 in New South Wales, Australia. The study was co-designed and implemented by a peer-based organisation representing people who use drugs. The primary outcomes were the number of tests performed and the proportion of people who initiated treatment within 12 weeks of testing. RESULTS: 674 participants received HCV point-of-care testing (median age, 45 years, 43% female), 48% injecting drug use ever, and 29% injecting in the previous 6 months. 84% (563 of 674) had no previous HCV treatment and received an antibody test, 20% (113 of 563) tested antibody positive, and 100% (113 of 113) received a reflex point-of-care RNA test. 16% (111 of 674) had previous HCV treatment and received immediate point-of-care RNA testing. HCV antibody prevalence was 33% (221 of 674) and was higher among people who had injected in the previous six months (73%, p < 0.001), and people who had injected, but not in the last six months (53%, p < 0.001) compared to people who had never injected drugs (3%). HCV RNA prevalence was 8% (53 of 674) and was higher among people who had injected in the previous six months (19%, p < 0.001), and people who had injected, but not in the last six months (10%, p < 0.001) compared to people who had never injected drugs (1%). Among people with current HCV, 19% (10 of 53) initiated treatment through the study. CONCLUSIONS: This peer-led mobile model facilitated testing and diagnosis, but a low proportion initiated HCV treatment. Further strategies should be explored to enhance linkage to treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Drug Policy
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2026.105240
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A peer-delivered mobile model to enhance access to hepatitis C point-of-care testing and treatment: The Peers on Wheels study

Kate Jennings, Julie Coutelas, Mary Harrod, Charles Henderson et al.
International Journal of Drug Policy
Diabetes Management and Education
article

A peer-delivered mobile model to enhance access to hepatitis C point-of-care testing and treatment: The Peers on Wheels study

Kate Jennings, Julie Coutelas, Mary Harrod, Charles Henderson, Melanie Kingsland, Alexandra Wade, Simon Comben, M.J. Stowe, Rodd Hinton, Evan Cunningham, Jason Grebely, Meghan Macdonald, Sarah Smith, Briallen Lloyd
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peer-based models supporting testing and treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have been explored, but peer-led testing is less common. We examined HCV testing and treatment following a mobile peer-led intervention integrating incentives, peer-delivered point-of-care HCV RNA testing, and linkage to care. METHODS: Peers On Wheels is an observational study of peer-led mobile outreach integrating incentives, peer-delivered point-of-care HCV antibody and RNA testing, same-day receipt of test results, and peer-assisted linkage to care and treatment to people at HCV risk. Participants were recruited between July 2022 and May 2023 in New South Wales, Australia. The study was co-designed and implemented by a peer-based organisation representing people who use drugs. The primary outcomes were the number of tests performed and the proportion of people who initiated treatment within 12 weeks of testing. RESULTS: 674 participants received HCV point-of-care testing (median age, 45 years, 43% female), 48% injecting drug use ever, and 29% injecting in the previous 6 months. 84% (563 of 674) had no previous HCV treatment and received an antibody test, 20% (113 of 563) tested antibody positive, and 100% (113 of 113) received a reflex point-of-care RNA test. 16% (111 of 674) had previous HCV treatment and received immediate point-of-care RNA testing. HCV antibody prevalence was 33% (221 of 674) and was higher among people who had injected in the previous six months (73%, p < 0.001), and people who had injected, but not in the last six months (53%, p < 0.001) compared to people who had never injected drugs (3%). HCV RNA prevalence was 8% (53 of 674) and was higher among people who had injected in the previous six months (19%, p < 0.001), and people who had injected, but not in the last six months (10%, p < 0.001) compared to people who had never injected drugs (1%). Among people with current HCV, 19% (10 of 53) initiated treatment through the study. CONCLUSIONS: This peer-led mobile model facilitated testing and diagnosis, but a low proportion initiated HCV treatment. Further strategies should be explored to enhance linkage to treatment.

International Journal of Drug PolicyVol. 152
New South Wales Department of Health (AU), Burnet Institute (AU), Kiryu University (JP), UNSW Sydney (AU), Association of Nurses in AIDS Care (US), Central Coast Local Health District (AU), South Eastern Sydney Local Health District (AU), Hunter New England Local Health District (AU)
Gilead Sciences, AbbVie, Cepheid, Department of Health and Aged Care, Australian Government, NSW Ministry of Health, National Health and Medical Research Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Diabetes Management and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.