Ore Genesis of the Baimashigou Porphyry Cu (Mo–Au) Deposit: Constraints from Sulfide Trace Element and S Isotope Analyses

The Baimashigou porphyry Cu (Mo–Au) deposit is located in the eastern segment of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt. In situ elemental and S isotopic analyses of sulfides indicate that distinct Au mineralization occurred concurrently with Cu and Mo mineralization in the deposit. Au occurs mainly as discrete particles hosted in carrollite, or as inclusions within both carrollite and pyrite, particularly in Py3-2 of stage 3. Geochemical data from magnetite and chalcopyrite record a gradual temperature decline during ore formation, with fluids sourced mainly from magmatic–hydrothermal sources. Sulfide δ34S values range from 0.10 to 1.62‰, consistent with a magmatic S origin. The ore-forming process is divided into four stages. Stage 1 veins comprise mainly K-feldspar and Magnetite. Sulfide precipitation, especially chalcopyrite and pyrite, becomes evident in Stage 2. Predominant precipitation of chalcopyrite and molybdenite occurred during Stage 3, whereas Stage 4 is dominated by calcite and fluorite. During Stages 2–3, Co preferentially partitioned into carrollite rather than pyrite. Based on S isotope thermometry, the equilibrium temperatures of Stage 3 are calculated to be 329–359°C, corresponding to mineralization pressures of 118–170 bar after Stage 3 correction. The persistent increase in δ34S values during mineralization suggests that hydrogen sulfide loss likely played a key role in driving sulfide precipitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geochemistry International
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s0016702925601251
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ore Genesis of the Baimashigou Porphyry Cu (Mo–Au) Deposit: Constraints from Sulfide Trace Element and S Isotope Analyses

Huichao Chen, Bo Yu, Renchang Mi, Tiancheng Zhou et al.
Geochemistry International
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
article

Ore Genesis of the Baimashigou Porphyry Cu (Mo–Au) Deposit: Constraints from Sulfide Trace Element and S Isotope Analyses

Huichao Chen, Bo Yu, Renchang Mi, Tiancheng Zhou, Yong Fu, Zhujun Liu, Qingdong Zeng
article en

Abstract

The Baimashigou porphyry Cu (Mo–Au) deposit is located in the eastern segment of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt. In situ elemental and S isotopic analyses of sulfides indicate that distinct Au mineralization occurred concurrently with Cu and Mo mineralization in the deposit. Au occurs mainly as discrete particles hosted in carrollite, or as inclusions within both carrollite and pyrite, particularly in Py3-2 of stage 3. Geochemical data from magnetite and chalcopyrite record a gradual temperature decline during ore formation, with fluids sourced mainly from magmatic–hydrothermal sources. Sulfide δ34S values range from 0.10 to 1.62‰, consistent with a magmatic S origin. The ore-forming process is divided into four stages. Stage 1 veins comprise mainly K-feldspar and Magnetite. Sulfide precipitation, especially chalcopyrite and pyrite, becomes evident in Stage 2. Predominant precipitation of chalcopyrite and molybdenite occurred during Stage 3, whereas Stage 4 is dominated by calcite and fluorite. During Stages 2–3, Co preferentially partitioned into carrollite rather than pyrite. Based on S isotope thermometry, the equilibrium temperatures of Stage 3 are calculated to be 329–359°C, corresponding to mineralization pressures of 118–170 bar after Stage 3 correction. The persistent increase in δ34S values during mineralization suggests that hydrogen sulfide loss likely played a key role in driving sulfide precipitation.

Geochemistry International
Guizhou University (CN), Ministry of Natural Resources (CN), China Geological Survey (CN), Ministry of Education (RO), Institute of Geology and Geophysics (AZ), Institute of Geology and Geophysics (CN), China Institute of Geological Environmental Monitoring (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.