Developing a national strategy to support implementation of reablement for community-dwelling people living with dementia

BACKGROUND: Dementia reablement is globally recommended to support people living with dementia to maximise their independence. Despite this, dementia reablement is not broadly available and there is currently no consensus around how it should be implemented. This study aimed to develop a national strategy by reaching expert consensus on the barriers, enablers, and potential implementation strategies to promote uptake of evidence-informed dementia reablement. METHODS: A modified online Delphi survey process was used to gain national consensus on the determinants and implementation strategies pertaining to implementing community-based dementia reablement in Australia. Purposive sampling and snowballing were used to recruit a range of knowledge and experience-based expert interest holders, including people living with dementia, informal/family carers, allied health professionals, program managers/referrers, policy makers, experts and thought leaders. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), round one sought consensus around a range of determinants (i.e. barriers and enablers) to implementing reablement for community dwelling people living with dementia across four domains: (1) the system, (2) service providers, (3) family, and (4) the person living with dementia. Using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) strategies compilation, round two sought consensus on a range of implementation strategies, presented across the same four domains. Across each domain in both survey rounds, participants were invited to provide written comments to supplement their ratings. Consensus for inclusion of each item was defined as ≥ 70% agreement across experts. RESULTS: Fifty participants completed the round one survey, and n = 35 (70%) participants completed round two. In round one, a range of determinants (barriers (n = 11) and enablers (n = 17)) for implementing community-based dementia reablement reached consensus. In round two, n = 28 implementation strategies reached consensus. Taken together, outcomes from this Delphi process highlight four key themes relating to the implementation of dementia reablement: (1) education and promotion, (2) engaging consumers and providing support to carers and people living with dementia, (3) service provider capacity to deliver reablement, and (4) funding, policy, and access to services. CONCLUSIONS: Effectively implementing dementia reablement will take a sector-wide approach that involves top-down and bottom-up support, focuses on education and promotion of reablement, and leverages policy and funding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Implementation Science Communications
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-026-00917-y
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing a national strategy to support implementation of reablement for community-dwelling people living with dementia

John F. Quinn, Susan Kurrle, Christopher J. Poulos, Glenys Petrie et al.
Implementation Science Communications
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Developing a national strategy to support implementation of reablement for community-dwelling people living with dementia

John F. Quinn, Susan Kurrle, Christopher J. Poulos, Glenys Petrie, Angela Collins, Kylie Miskovski, Sasha Houlden, Natalie Taylor, Kaarin J. Anstey, Michele Callisaya, Claire MC O’Connor
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dementia reablement is globally recommended to support people living with dementia to maximise their independence. Despite this, dementia reablement is not broadly available and there is currently no consensus around how it should be implemented. This study aimed to develop a national strategy by reaching expert consensus on the barriers, enablers, and potential implementation strategies to promote uptake of evidence-informed dementia reablement. METHODS: A modified online Delphi survey process was used to gain national consensus on the determinants and implementation strategies pertaining to implementing community-based dementia reablement in Australia. Purposive sampling and snowballing were used to recruit a range of knowledge and experience-based expert interest holders, including people living with dementia, informal/family carers, allied health professionals, program managers/referrers, policy makers, experts and thought leaders. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), round one sought consensus around a range of determinants (i.e. barriers and enablers) to implementing reablement for community dwelling people living with dementia across four domains: (1) the system, (2) service providers, (3) family, and (4) the person living with dementia. Using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) strategies compilation, round two sought consensus on a range of implementation strategies, presented across the same four domains. Across each domain in both survey rounds, participants were invited to provide written comments to supplement their ratings. Consensus for inclusion of each item was defined as ≥ 70% agreement across experts. RESULTS: Fifty participants completed the round one survey, and n = 35 (70%) participants completed round two. In round one, a range of determinants (barriers (n = 11) and enablers (n = 17)) for implementing community-based dementia reablement reached consensus. In round two, n = 28 implementation strategies reached consensus. Taken together, outcomes from this Delphi process highlight four key themes relating to the implementation of dementia reablement: (1) education and promotion, (2) engaging consumers and providing support to carers and people living with dementia, (3) service provider capacity to deliver reablement, and (4) funding, policy, and access to services. CONCLUSIONS: Effectively implementing dementia reablement will take a sector-wide approach that involves top-down and bottom-up support, focuses on education and promotion of reablement, and leverages policy and funding.

Implementation Science CommunicationsVol. 7(1)
The University of Sydney (AU), University of Tasmania (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Dementia Collaborative Research Centres (AU), Peninsula Health (AU), Dementia UK (GB), Expert System (Italy) (IT), Centre for Ageing Better (GB), Impact (CA), Neuroscience Research Australia (AU)
Dementia Centre for Research Collaboration, Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.